Agricultural Machine Control Using In Situ Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural machines face challenges in maintaining consistent work quality due to inaccuracies in automated control systems, leading to issues such as unharvested areas or incomplete field coverage during operations like harvesting or tilling, despite using worksite maps or imagery.

Innovation Solution

A control system that utilizes image-based work quality analysis to adjust machine settings based on performance metrics from previous passes, ensuring improved coverage and efficiency by adjusting settings like header positioning or speed during subsequent passes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated control systems use worksite maps or imagery to guide agricultural machines, then operational efficiency is improved, but work quality consistency deteriorates due to coverage gaps and incomplete field coverage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidwork quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures image data during agricultural operations, processes this data to identify coverage gaps and unharvested areas, and uses this feedback information to adjust machine settings and guidance for subsequent passes. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to maintain high productivity while improving work quality consistency by correcting coverage issues in real-time or near-real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts machine operating parameters such as header positioning, travel speed, and pass spacing based on actual field conditions observed in image data. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain optimal productivity while ensuring consistent work quality across varying field conditions, soil types, and crop densities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If machine settings are adjusted based on performance metrics from previous passes, then coverage gaps are reduced, but system complexity increases due to image processing and adaptive control requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by automatically processing its own operational data and image captures to identify coverage gaps. The machine autonomously determines optimal settings for subsequent passes without requiring external intervention, thereby reducing coverage gaps while managing complexity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual monitoring and adjustment mechanisms with automated image processing and electronic control systems. By substituting mechanical observation and manual adjustment with optical sensing and computational analysis, the system achieves improved coverage completeness while the complexity is managed through software-based solutions rather than additional mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If in situ image data is captured and analyzed during operations, then work quality is enhanced through real-time feedback, but energy consumption increases due to imaging and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures image data at periodic intervals rather than continuously, processing images at strategic points during operational passes. This periodic sampling approach provides sufficient feedback for quality enhancement while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous imaging and processing, maintaining an optimal balance between work quality and energy usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250107478A1Agricultural machine control using work quality based on in situ operation sensing
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 DEERE & CO
  • US20250107478A1 patent drawing
  • US20250107478A1 patent drawing
  • US20250107478A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a mobile agricultural machine that includes performing an agricultural operation during a given pass in a field using a first set of machine settings, obtaining in situ data representing the agricultural operation during the given pass, generating a performance metric based on the in situ data, identifying a second set of machine settings based on the performance metric, and outputting a control instruction that controls the mobile agricultural machine during a subsequent pass in the field based on the second set of machine settings.