Agricultural Sensor Triggering for Selective Field Documentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural field work documentation methods are inadequate for less trained operators, as they require specialist knowledge and generate excessive data, making it difficult to analyze and address issues such as low yields, which can be caused by various factors like seed quantity, water supply, or soil conditions.

Innovation Solution

An automated system using operating parameter sensors and crop sensors connected to a computer unit that generates trigger signals for predetermined conditions, storing or transmitting image data from an image recording device to facilitate remote analysis and decision-making, thereby simplifying situation tracking without excessive data accumulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If image data from a camera is recorded for an entire field to identify weeds later, then complete field documentation is achieved, but enormous amounts of data are generated that require machine evaluation and storage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield documentation completenessVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the relevant information from the entire field by using sensors to detect specific conditions (weed presence, crop health indicators) and triggering image recording only at those locations. This selective approach removes unnecessary data while preserving critical information needed for analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The field is segmented into zones of interest based on sensor detection. Instead of treating the entire field uniformly, the system divides it into areas requiring documentation (where anomalies are detected) and areas that can be skipped, thereby reducing overall data volume while maintaining documentation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If markers are set by the operator to document situations like weed occurrence or insect infestation, then specific field issues can be recorded, but sufficient specialist knowledge is required to recognize and evaluate the situations correctly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield issue documentationVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting field conditions through sensors and autonomously triggering image recording without requiring the operator to identify or evaluate problems. The machine itself monitors its own operation and the field conditions, eliminating the need for operator expertise in problem recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor operating parameters and crop conditions, and this information feeds back to the control unit which automatically triggers documentation when predetermined conditions are met. This closed-loop system replaces manual operator judgment with automated condition-based responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If operating parameters and crop properties are continuously monitored with sensors, then automatic detection of field situations is achieved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic situation recognitionVSAvoidsensor and computer unit integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it processes sensor data, compares readings against predetermined conditions, triggers image recording, and manages data storage. By making the control unit multi-functional, the patent avoids adding separate dedicated components for each function, thereby managing system complexity while achieving automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the sensor system, control unit with condition comparison logic, and image recording trigger into an integrated monitoring system. Rather than separate independent systems, these components are merged into a coordinated unit that automatically responds to field conditions, reducing overall system complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2591654B1Assembly and method for automatic documentation of situations in agricultural work
Publication Date: 2015.01.07 DEERE & CO
  • EP2591654B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2591654B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

An arrangement and a method for the automatic documentation of situations during fieldwork, wherein: an operating parameter sensor (92, 94) detects an operating parameter of an agricultural machine (10) during fieldwork and/or a crop sensor (66, 70, 88, 100, 102) detects a property of crop picked up and/or processed by the agricultural machine (10) during fieldwork, a computer unit (76) generates a trigger signal when a predetermined condition of the received signals from the operating parameter sensor (92, 94) and/or crop sensor (66, 70, 88, 100, 102) is met, and the computer unit (76) is connected to an image acquisition device (66, 70, 86) for generating an image signal of the agricultural machine (10) and/or its surroundings and georeferences image signals in response to a trigger signal and/or transmits them via a transmission link to a remote location (108) sent.