Agricultural Cutting Device Knife Selection Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting devices for agricultural crops require high operational forces and additional movement to adjust the number of knives, leading to increased effort and limited installation space, especially in baling presses.

Innovation Solution

A cutting device with a selection mechanism that engages only selected clamping units with a common actuating device, utilizing a camshaft to move clamping units between active and inactive states, reducing the need for unnecessary force and allowing for a lower overall height design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If all clamping units are engaged with the common adjusting device to move knives into operating position, then all knives can be positioned, but unnecessarily high forces are required especially when high numbers of knives are available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of knivesVSAvoidoperational force
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the clamping units into two distinct groups: active clamping units that are engaged with the common adjusting device and moved into operating position, and inactive clamping units that remain disengaged and stay in the retracted position. This segmentation allows only the necessary number of knives to be activated, reducing the total force required while maintaining adaptability to different harvesting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a rotor is moved into the adjustment range to block spiral springs for selecting number of knives, then knife selection is enabled, but additional movement and installation space are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknife selection capabilityVSAvoidmovement requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of moving the rotor into the adjustment range to block spiral springs (as in prior art), the invention inverts the approach by keeping the rotor stationary and using a camshaft that rotates independently to selectively engage clamping units. This inversion eliminates the need for additional rotor movement while maintaining full knife selection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The camshaft serves multiple functions: it enables knife selection by engaging specific clamping units, provides the blocking mechanism equivalent to the rotor movement in prior art, and does so without requiring additional installation space or complex movements. This multi-functional component resolves the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a common adjusting device tensions all spiral springs regardless of desired number of knives, then all knives can be activated, but reduced effort operation is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefull knife activation capabilityVSAvoidoperational effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The common adjusting device is designed to work selectively with only the active clamping units rather than all clamping units. The camshaft controls which clamping units are engaged with the adjusting device, ensuring that effort is applied only where needed. This segmentation maintains the capability to activate all knives if required while significantly reducing operational effort when fewer knives are needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces operational effort and allows for a more compact design by selectively engaging clamping units, minimizing the forces required and optimizing the use of space, while ensuring safe and efficient knife positioning.

Implementation Method 1

The clamping units assigned to the knives and located next to one another, in particular their tappets, are arranged lying above the camshaft in the sense of a bed. Due to the effect of gravity, the restoring movement from the raised state can therefore advantageously take place automatically if the clamping unit is not raised by a cam or is held in the raised state by the common adjusting device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2653025B1Cutting device for agricultural crops
Publication Date: 2015.04.08 USINES CLAAS FRANCE SAS
  • EP2653025B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2653025B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2653025B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cutting device (16) for agricultural crops, in particular for use on a baler or a forage wagon, comprising a number of knives (8) arranged side by side in a row with respect to a channel (9) through which crops flow and which are pivotable about a knife axis (17) extending transversely to the channel (9) between an out-of-service position (PA) and an operating position, and clamping units (18) associated with the knives (8) which are movable in engagement with a common actuating device (19) in order to pivot the knives (8) from the out-of-service position (PA) to the operating position, is characterized by a common selection mechanism (21) associated with the clamping units (18) which can move selected clamping units (18) from an inactive state (Zinactive), in which they are without engagement with the common actuating device (19), to an active state (Zactive).in which they engage with the common actuating device (19).