Agricultural Dual-Clutch Transmission Layout for Low-Loss Range Shifting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dual-clutch transmission architectures for agricultural vehicles suffer from high energy losses due to large wet clutches, significant inertia during gear shifting, and increased fuel consumption, necessitating improvements in efficiency, comfort, and compactness while reducing manufacturing time and weight.

Innovation Solution

The proposed dual-clutch transmission architecture features a staggered arrangement of clutches and gears, with an additional gearing module and a direct clutch swap mechanism in the range stage, allowing for efficient torque distribution and reduced inertia, enabling smoother shifting and increased compactness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If large wet clutches are used to enable range gear shifting, then gear shifting capability is improved, but energy loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear shifting capabilityVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission is divided into two independent clutch assemblies: a first clutch assembly for speed ratio changes and a second clutch assembly for range gear changes. This segmentation allows each clutch to be optimized for its specific function, enabling the use of smaller clutches overall while maintaining full shifting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dual-clutch architecture that operates in two distinct dimensional spaces: one clutch handles speed ratio transitions while the other manages range gear transitions. This dimensional separation eliminates the need for a single large clutch to handle all shifting operations simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If traditional DCT architecture is used, then powershift capability is achieved, but fuel consumption increases during shifting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowershift capabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the clutch functions into two separate assemblies, the patent reduces the inertia and energy requirements for each individual shifting operation. Each clutch can be smaller and lighter, reducing the energy penalty during engagement and disengagement cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The independent second clutch assembly acts as an intermediary that pre-positions range gears without requiring torque transfer through the main clutch assembly. This mediator clutch enables smoother transitions and reduces the resistive torque that normally increases fuel consumption during shifts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If more gear ratios are provided, then transmission versatility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of gear ratiosVSAvoidtransmission complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission system is segmented into two independent clutch assemblies, each managing a specific subset of gear changes. This segmentation allows for a higher total number of gear ratios to be achieved through coordinated operation of the two clutches without proportionally increasing the complexity of each individual clutch mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each clutch assembly is designed with multi-functionality: the first clutch assembly can operate independently for speed ratios, the second clutch assembly can operate independently for range gears, and they can coordinate to provide the full spectrum of gear ratios. This universal design reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional clutch arrangement is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but transmission weight and axial extension increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtransmission weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent arranges the two clutch assemblies in a staggered axial configuration rather than stacking them directly one after another. This dimensional arrangement reduces the overall axial extension of the transmission while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardized clutch component placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The second clutch assembly is positioned to overlap axially with the first clutch assembly, creating a nested arrangement where the clutches share common structural support elements. This nesting reduces the total weight and axial length without complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentEP4411173A1Double clutch architecture transmission for agricultural vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 CNH IND ITALIA SPA
  • EP4411173A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4411173A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4411173A1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Architecture for a dual clutch transmission (1) for an off road vehicle provided with an input stage (A), a gear ratio stage (B) and a range gear ratio stage (C) operatively connected in series one to the other with respect to an input shaft (2) and an output shaft (3), the transmission (1) comprises selection elements (17) configured to selectively couple gears (14, 15) of gear ratio stage (B) to respective first and second shafts (11, 12) and a gearing module (30) defining intermediate speed ratios with respect to the speed ratios of the rage gear ratio stage (C).