Agricultural Machine Fault Cause Analysis Using Operating and Design Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining the cause of faults in agricultural machines are inefficient and costly, often relying on retrospective experience without data-driven analysis, leading to prolonged downtime and unnecessary part replacements during critical harvest periods.

Innovation Solution

A method using operational and design data from agricultural machines, combined with environmental and test data, to identify whether utilization or design issues contribute to faults, employing a computer system for data aggregation and analysis to distinguish between random and systematic effects, and isolate failure causes, including error chains and material defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If retrospective experience-based methods are used to determine fault causes, then diagnostic simplicity is maintained, but diagnostic accuracy and reliability deteriorate due to lack of actual fault data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic simplicityVSAvoidfault cause identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects and stores operational data, environmental data, and fault data in advance during normal machine operation. This preliminary data accumulation enables accurate fault cause identification when faults occur, without requiring complex real-time analysis during diagnostic procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A computer system acts as an intermediary between raw data collection and fault diagnosis. The computer system processes operational data, environmental data, and fault data to generate meaningful fault cause information, simplifying the diagnostic process while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection and analysis systems are implemented, then fault cause identification accuracy improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault cause identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects multiple types of data (operational data, environmental data, fault data) using a unified data collection framework. This multi-functional approach enables the system to handle various fault scenarios with a single integrated system, managing complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically processes and analyzes collected data without requiring manual intervention. The computer system autonomously identifies fault causes by processing operational data, environmental data, and fault data, reducing the need for complex manual diagnostic procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If data-driven fault analysis is performed, then repair time and downtime are reduced, but loss of time for data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair speedVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Operational data, environmental data, and fault data are collected and stored in advance during normal machine operation. When faults occur, the pre-collected data is immediately available for analysis, eliminating data collection delays during repair scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors machine operation and feeds operational data back to the database. This continuous feedback loop ensures data is always current and ready for immediate analysis when faults occur, minimizing data processing time during repairs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If aggregated data from multiple machines is analyzed, then identification of systematic faults and hidden interdependencies improves, but quantity of data to be processed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause identification capabilityVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to handle multiple data types (operational data, environmental data, fault data) from multiple machines within a unified framework. This universal approach enables systematic fault identification across the machine fleet without requiring separate processing systems for each data type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The computer system serves as an intermediary that processes aggregated data from multiple machines. It identifies systematic faults and hidden interdependencies by analyzing patterns across the data, managing the complexity of large data volumes while maintaining high root cause identification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3741196B1Method for determining a fault cause in an agricultural working machine
Publication Date: 2022.11.30 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP3741196B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for determining the cause of a fault in an agricultural machine (1) with a defective component (4), wherein an analysis routine is used based on operating data of the agricultural machine (1) comprising utilization data, at least design data of the defective component (4) and design data assigned to the agricultural machine (1), and fault cause data, wherein the analysis routine determines whether a utilization and/or a design of the agricultural machine (1), in particular of the defective component (4), can be excluded and/or identified as a cause of the fault.