Agricultural Machine Speed Control with Dynamic Mass and Draft Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current speed control and brake architectures in autonomous agricultural machines are limited by worst-case scenarios, leading to reduced productivity due to unnecessary speed restrictions based on maximum possible stopping distances, rather than dynamically changing vehicle masses and loads.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system that calculates stopping distances based on dynamically changing vehicle mass and draft loads, adjusting maximum speed limits to ensure effective stopping distances while optimizing productivity by allowing higher speeds when possible.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If speed control is limited to worst-case scenarios, then safety is ensured, but productivity decreases due to unnecessary speed restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts speed limits based on real-time vehicle mass and draft load conditions rather than using fixed worst-case speed restrictions. The controller continuously monitors changing vehicle mass (e.g., grain cart weight) and draft load (implement resistance) to calculate appropriate speed limits, allowing the vehicle to operate at higher speeds when conditions permit while maintaining safety margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the speed parameter dynamically based on measured vehicle mass and draft load. Instead of maintaining a constant conservative speed limit, the controller adjusts the maximum speed parameter in real-time according to actual operating conditions, thereby optimizing productivity while ensuring safe stopping distances are maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fixed maximum speed limits are used, then stopping distance safety is ensured, but operational efficiency decreases due to unnecessary speed restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping distance safetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static fixed speed limits to dynamic speed limits that adapt to real-time vehicle mass and draft load conditions. The controller continuously calculates appropriate speed limits based on current operating parameters, enabling the vehicle to maintain safe stopping distances while operating at optimized speeds for each specific condition rather than being constrained by a fixed conservative limit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If conservative speed limits are applied, then safety margins are maintained, but productivity is reduced due to unnecessary speed restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety marginsVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring vehicle mass and draft load conditions, comparing actual operating parameters against safety requirements, and adjusting speed limits accordingly. This closed-loop approach maintains appropriate safety margins while avoiding unnecessary conservative restrictions, as the controller only limits speed when actual conditions require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the speed limit parameter based on real-time measurements of vehicle mass and draft load. Instead of applying a fixed conservative speed limit, the controller adjusts the speed parameter to match actual operating conditions, maintaining safety margins only when necessary while maximizing productivity during favorable conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250331443A1Systems and methods for controlling speed of an agricultural machine
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 DEERE & CO
  • US20250331443A1 patent drawing
  • US20250331443A1 patent drawing
  • US20250331443A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more techniques and systems are disclosed for controlling a speed of an agricultural machine may comprise determining a mass of a vehicle system of the agricultural machine. The vehicle system may comprise the agricultural machine and one or more of a container and an implement operably connected to the agricultural machine. A controller may calculate a stopping distance of the agricultural machine based on a braking capacity for the agricultural machine and using one or more of a determined dynamically changing mass of the agricultural machine and the dynamically changing brake load of the implement. A maximum speed for the agricultural machine may be determined based on the calculated stopping distance and the speed of the agricultural machine, which may be controlled to be below the maximum speed.