Agricultural Machine Parameter Optimization via Database Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optimizing operating parameters of agricultural machines is complex and often relies on operator experience, leading to inefficient and suboptimal settings, especially when external conditions vary, and existing methods do not guarantee optimal results due to reliance on experiential knowledge.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that allow operators to compare operating parameters and work results across multiple agricultural machines in a machine association, integrating empirical knowledge and providing optimization instructions to quickly and reliably determine optimal settings based on specific conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If operator relies on personal experience and trial-and-error to optimize operating parameters, then optimization quality may be improved through individual expertise, but optimization time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization qualityVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system copies and transfers optimized operating parameter sets from experienced operators to less experienced operators. The database stores previously determined optimal parameters, allowing operators to access and apply proven settings without retesting, thus reducing optimization time while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where work results are monitored and fed back into the database. This allows the system to learn from actual performance data and refine future parameter recommendations, improving optimization quality over time while reducing the need for repeated trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If operator tests multiple machine settings to achieve optimal configuration, then optimization thoroughness is improved, but information processing load and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization thoroughnessVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of optimal operating parameters through database research before the operator needs to configure the machine. By pre-calculating and storing optimal settings based on historical data and work results, the system eliminates the need for operators to conduct extensive testing and analysis during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If operator assigns effects to correct operating parameters during optimization, then parameter identification accuracy is improved, but operational complexity and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter identification accuracyVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system copies established relationships between operating parameters and work results from the database. Instead of operators manually analyzing and assigning causes to effects during optimization, the system provides pre-analyzed parameter-work result relationships, improving identification accuracy while reducing the time and effort required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Adaptability or versatility

If external harvesting conditions vary between operations, then adaptability requirement is improved, but optimization consistency and reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to conditionsVSAvoidoptimization consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by determining optimal operating parameters specifically tailored to local harvesting conditions. The database stores condition-specific parameter settings, allowing the system to adapt to varying external conditions (crop type, weather, field conditions) while maintaining consistent optimization methodology, thus achieving both adaptability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2110012B1Method and device for optimising operational parameters of an agricultural work machine
Publication Date: 2012.03.14 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP2110012B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2110012B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2110012B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The method involves displaying an additional set of operating parameters (11) e.g. upper sieve size, and/or a set of work results (21) resultant from the additional set of operating parameters of an agricultural working machine i.e. combine harvester, working with another agricultural working machine, to an operator in addition to a set of operating parameters and/or another set of work results. The additional set of operating parameters and/or the former set of work results are displayed in the form of a numerical value (22), character, pictogram, diagram (40) and/or camera image (23). An independent claim is also included for a device for optimizing an operating parameter of an agricultural working machine.