Agricultural ML Model Gating for Unauthorized Area Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural operations face challenges in securing machine learning models from unauthorized access and use, particularly in rural areas with limited network connectivity, where bad actors can steal and deploy models in unauthorized environments, leading to inaccurate inferences.

Innovation Solution

Training agricultural inference machine learning models to differentiate between authorized and unauthorized agricultural areas by using ground truth sensor data to generate valid inferences in authorized areas and ambiguous or invalid inferences in unauthorized areas, leveraging techniques such as recurrent neural networks and synthetic data generation to ensure model security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If machine learning models are deployed in edge computing devices with limited network connectivity, then agricultural operations can make inferences in rural areas, but bad actors can steal and deploy models in unauthorized environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel deployment capabilityVSAvoidmodel security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by training the model to recognize specific environmental characteristics of authorized agricultural regions. The model learns local sensor data patterns, weather conditions, and agricultural conditions unique to each authorized region, enabling it to function reliably only in those specific locations while preventing unauthorized deployment elsewhere

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by training the machine learning model during development to identify and memorize the environmental characteristics of authorized agricultural regions. This pre-training ensures that when the model is deployed at the edge, it can independently verify whether the current environment matches the authorized region without requiring real-time network verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If models are trained to be specific to certain agricultural regions, then model security is improved, but model adaptability to different environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel securityVSAvoidenvironmental flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The model is trained to recognize specific environmental signatures of authorized agricultural regions including local weather patterns, sensor data characteristics, and agricultural conditions. This region-specific training creates a form of digital fingerprinting that ensures the model only functions correctly in its authorized environment while maintaining high security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of environmental specificity (reduced adaptability) into a security benefit. By training the model to be highly sensitive to environmental characteristics, unauthorized deployment in different regions naturally causes the model to fail or produce incorrect results, thereby preventing model theft and misuse without requiring additional security mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If encryption is used to protect the model, then model security is improved, but model accessibility by authorized users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel securityVSAvoidmodel accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service security where the model itself performs the verification function. Instead of requiring external encryption keys or authentication systems, the model autonomously verifies whether the deployment environment is authorized by comparing current sensor data and environmental conditions against the characteristics it learned during training in authorized regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12585991B2Digital rights management of machine learning models
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 DEERE & CO
  • US12585991B2 patent drawing
  • US12585991B2 patent drawing
  • US12585991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for training an agricultural inference machine learning model to generate valid agricultural inferences of agricultural conditions based on ground truth sensor data that falls within a plurality of ground truth sensor value ranges associated with a particular agricultural area, and to generate invalid or ambiguous agricultural inferences of agricultural conditions based on ground truth sensor data that falls outside of the plurality of ground truth sensor value ranges associated with a particular agricultural area. The agricultural inference machine learning model is trained, based on ground truth sensor data for the particular agricultural area, to determine if the subsequently received ground truth sensor data falls within or outside of that plurality of ground truth sensor value ranges that correspond to the particular agricultural area.