Agricultural Object Detection Using Dual Classification Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object detection systems for agricultural machines struggle to identify a wide range of objects across various environments, including both agricultural and non-agricultural settings, leading to reduced effectiveness and increased operator workload due to misclassification and failure to recognize obstacles.

Innovation Solution

A control system utilizing two detection models, one trained on an agricultural dataset and the other on a generic dataset, analyzes image data to determine a classification metric for object overlap, prioritizing the agricultural model's output for improved identification and contextual awareness, and adjusts thresholds based on environmental context to enhance object detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If object detection algorithms are trained on a wider dataset to include all possible working scenarios, then the adaptability of the system improves, but the training complexity and computational resources required become unworkable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the object detection task into multiple specialized detection models, each trained on a specific dataset (e.g., agricultural objects, road objects, pedestrians). This segmentation allows each model to be trained on focused, manageable datasets rather than requiring one massive model trained on all possible scenarios, thereby reducing overall training complexity while maintaining comprehensive detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal object detection framework that can handle multiple object types and environments by combining multiple specialized models. The framework provides multi-functionality by adapting which detection models to use based on the operating context (agricultural environment vs. road environment), achieving versatility without requiring each individual model to be trained on all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single detection model is trained on diverse datasets to cover all scenarios, then the versatility improves, but the measurement precision for specific object classes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection task into multiple specialized models, each optimized for specific object classes (e.g., one model for agricultural objects, another for road objects). This segmentation ensures that each model achieves high measurement precision for its specific domain by being trained exclusively on relevant data, rather than diluting precision across all object types in a single model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by making each detection model specialized for specific local conditions and object types. Each model develops high precision for its specific domain (e.g., agricultural model for field objects, road model for traffic objects) rather than attempting uniform performance across all scenarios, thereby maintaining high classification accuracy for relevant objects in each context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If multiple detection models are used to improve identification accuracy, then the reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple specialized detection models into a unified system with a single controller that coordinates their operation. The controller integrates the outputs of multiple models and resolves conflicts or redundancies, achieving high reliability through combined detection capability while managing system complexity through centralized coordination rather than requiring complex interactions between independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that manages the interaction between multiple detection models. It receives inputs from various models, processes their outputs, and determines the final object classification. This intermediary structure allows multiple models to work together reliably while the controller manages the complexity of coordinating them, preventing the system from becoming unmanageably complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12464963B2Object detection system
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 AGCO INT GMBH
  • US12464963B2 patent drawing
  • US12464963B2 patent drawing
  • US12464963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object detection system for an agricultural machine which utilises image data from one or more imaging sensors associated with the agricultural machine. The image data is analysed utilising first and second detection models to classify, for one or both models, an object within the environment of the agricultural machine. A classification metric for the object indicative of an overlap associated with the classification obtained for each of the models for the object is used in determining an identity for the object. One or more operable components associated with the agricultural machine may then be controlled in dependence on the determined identity.