Agricultural Machine Path Control at Decision Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural machines face challenges in efficiently navigating decision points while minimizing crop damage, soil compaction, and ensuring safety, as existing control systems do not adequately consider agronomic and vehicle parameters in real-time decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A control system that integrates agronomic, vehicle, and machine safety parameters to make informed decisions at decision points by processing route information, agronomic factors, and vehicle capabilities, generating control signals to adjust the machine's path and functions accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control is used for navigation, then operational flexibility is maintained, but navigation efficiency and precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidnavigation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent modules: navigation module, agronomic factor processing module, vehicle parameter processing module, and control signal generation module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, allowing manual override when needed while maintaining automated efficiency for routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts between manual and automated modes based on operational conditions. The navigation system can switch between GPS-guided autonomous mode and manual control mode, providing both navigation efficiency and operational flexibility as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If automated path selection is implemented, then navigation efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a single platform: navigation, agronomic data processing, vehicle parameter monitoring, and path optimization. This multi-functional approach improves navigation efficiency while managing complexity through unified system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically processes agronomic factors and vehicle parameters to generate optimal paths without requiring constant human intervention. The autonomous decision-making capability improves navigation efficiency while the standardized algorithms keep system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple parameters are considered for path selection, then decision accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Agronomic factors and vehicle parameters are pre-processed and stored in ready-to-use formats before navigation decisions are required. This preliminary preparation allows the system to quickly retrieve and evaluate multiple parameters simultaneously, improving decision accuracy without increasing real-time processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors and updates parameter values in real-time, using feedback loops to refine path selections. This allows accurate decision-making based on current conditions while maintaining efficient processing through iterative optimization rather than exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If autonomous operation is implemented, then operational efficiency improves, but safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system acts as an intermediary between autonomous navigation and physical machine operation. It processes agronomic and vehicle parameters to generate safe, optimized paths while maintaining the ability to override autonomous decisions, thus improving operational efficiency while managing safety risks through layered control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12619235B2Agricultural machine control based on agronomic and machine parameters
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 DEERE & CO
  • US12619235B2 patent drawing
  • US12619235B2 patent drawing
  • US12619235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system detects an agricultural machine position to determine when the agricultural machine is approaching a decision point. The decision point is a point at which the agricultural machine can move forward along one of two or more predefined possible paths. The control system detects agronomic factors and vehicle-related parameters to decide on the path to take at the decision point. The control system then generates control signals to pursue the path decided upon.