Agricultural Path Planning for Tendering Time and Location

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Challenges exist in predicting when tendering operations should occur during agricultural operations, leading to inefficiencies such as agricultural machines idling while waiting for refills, and there is a need for better logistic planning of these operations.

Innovation Solution

A path planning system that generates and evaluates multiple potential plans for agricultural operations, considering various inputs, and selects a final plan based on scoring criteria to optimize tendering locations and times, which can be communicated to machines and operators for execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional single-plan path planning is used, then the planning system is simple, but agricultural machines experience idle time waiting for tendering operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoididle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates multiple potential plans in advance, evaluating tendering locations and times before the agricultural operation begins. This preliminary planning allows the system to pre-coordinate tendering operations, ensuring that agricultural machines are refilled at optimal times and locations without experiencing idle waiting time during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically evaluates multiple potential plans based on varying parameters such as tendering locations, times, and machine paths. By considering multiple dynamic scenarios rather than a single static plan, the system can adapt to changing conditions and optimize operational efficiency while minimizing idle time through flexible, data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple potential plans are generated and evaluated, then operational efficiency is improved, but the planning system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidplanning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The planning system automatically generates, evaluates, and selects optimal plans without requiring complex manual intervention. The system self-manages the complexity of evaluating multiple potential plans by implementing automated scoring and selection algorithms, reducing the operational burden despite the increased computational tasks involved in multi-plan analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250261575A1Path planning
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 DEERE & CO
  • US20250261575A1 patent drawing
  • US20250261575A1 patent drawing
  • US20250261575A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A path planning system and technique automatically plans an agricultural operation performed by an agricultural machine based on various inputs. Based on acquired input data, a plurality of potential plans or paths for the agricultural operation are generated. The plurality of plans are evaluated based on a set of considerations and scored. A ranking based on scores facilitates automatic selected of a final plan for the agricultural operation. The system communicates the final plan and/or instructions based on the final plan to coordinate execution of the agricultural operation among several entities.