Agricultural Vehicle Route Guidance Using Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural processes are inefficient due to deterministic algorithms that fail to adapt to the complex and variable nature of agricultural environments, leading to suboptimal field coverage and resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

Employing a guidance reinforcement learning model to generate adaptive guidance information for agricultural vehicles, using feedback to adjust the model and improve route planning and field coverage efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If deterministic algorithms (graph-based methods or grid-based algorithms) are used for field coverage and route planning, then the system provides well-defined and rigid rules and patterns, but the system fails to adapt to the complex and variable nature of agricultural environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to environmental conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies reinforcement learning to transform static, deterministic route planning into a dynamic system that continuously adapts to environmental conditions. The RL agent learns optimal policies through interaction with the environment, enabling the system to dynamically adjust routes based on real-time conditions such as soil moisture, crop health, and terrain variations, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of route planning by transitioning from fixed deterministic rules to probabilistic policies learned through reinforcement learning. The RL model adjusts routing parameters based on environmental state observations, allowing the system to adapt to varying agricultural conditions while managing complexity through learned patterns rather than exhaustive rule sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If traditional deterministic algorithms are used for field coverage, then the system follows rigid rules and patterns, but the system achieves suboptimal field coverage and resource utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield coverage efficiencyVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning system implements continuous feedback loops where the agent observes environmental states, executes actions, and receives rewards or penalties based on performance. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past decisions and improve field coverage efficiency over time, optimizing resource utilization by adjusting routes based on actual environmental conditions rather than following predetermined patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The RL agent autonomously optimizes route planning without requiring external intervention or manual adjustment. The system self-adapts to environmental conditions by learning optimal strategies through interaction, thereby improving field coverage efficiency and resource utilization automatically. The agent serves itself by continuously refining its policies based on experienced outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If reinforcement learning models are used to generate adaptive guidance information, then the system achieves dynamic adaptation to environmental conditions, but the system requires complex model training and adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adaptation capabilityVSAvoidmodel training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary training of the reinforcement learning model using simulated agricultural environments before deployment. By pre-training the RL agent in virtual scenarios that mimic real agricultural conditions, the system reduces the complexity of on-field adjustment and enables rapid adaptation to actual environmental variations. The preliminary training establishes baseline policies that can be fine-tuned with minimal additional complexity during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250370454A1Guiding an Agricultural Vehicle Using Reinforcement Learning
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 AGCO INT GMBH
  • US20250370454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370454A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanism for generating a recommended route for an agricultural vehicle in advance of performing an agricultural process. The mechanism further includes tracking adherence of the agricultural vehicle to the recommended route and/or controlling the vehicle to follow the recommended route. The recommended route is generated responsive to the classification(s) of one or more segments of a boundary of a predetermined region in which the agricultural process is to be performed.