Agricultural System Process Supervisor for Forage Harvesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural systems for feed harvesting primarily rely on moisture or dry matter content to control the harvesting process, which does not ensure high-quality, storage-worthy crops with optimal energy content.

Innovation Solution

An agricultural system with a process supervisor that coordinates and optimizes various machines through data exchange, using a higher-level control unit to manage partial processing steps, taking into account quality parameters and external influences to achieve optimal crop quality for specific uses such as biogas production, animal feeding, or hay storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual work steps are regulated based solely on moisture content, then control of harvesting steps is simplified, but crop quality suitable for storage is not ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol of harvesting stepsVSAvoidcrop quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from controlling only moisture content to monitoring multiple quality parameters including dry matter content, crop composition, and weather conditions. This multi-parameter approach enables precise regulation of harvesting steps while maintaining simplified operation through automated decision-making algorithms that process all inputs to determine optimal timing for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor crop parameters throughout the harvesting process, and this data is fed back to automatically adjust subsequent operations. The feedback mechanism ensures that each harvesting step is optimized based on real-time crop conditions, guaranteeing high-quality output while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If a complete forage harvesting process is implemented with comprehensive control, then crop quality is ensured, but system complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The harvesting system is divided into independent modular units, each responsible for a specific function (sensing, data processing, actuation). Each module operates semi-independently with standardized interfaces, allowing the system to achieve comprehensive quality control through coordinated modules while managing complexity through modular architecture that enables independent development, testing, and maintenance of each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs universal control algorithms and data structures that can handle multiple crop types and harvesting operations through a single integrated platform. The multi-functional design allows the same hardware and software infrastructure to support various harvesting scenarios, ensuring high crop quality across different applications without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple quality parameters are monitored and processed, then optimal crop quality for specific uses is achieved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop quality for specific usesVSAvoiddata processing power
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and filtering at the sensor level and edge devices before transmitting data to central processing units. By pre-processing data locally to extract only relevant features and discard redundant information, the system achieves high-precision quality assessment for specific crop uses while significantly reducing the computational power required at centralized processing nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4449844A1Agricultural system
Publication Date: 2024.10.23 CLAAS SAULGAU GMBH
  • EP4449844A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4449844A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4449844A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to an agricultural system (1) for carrying out a forage harvesting process chain (13), comprising: - at least one agricultural machine (31) for carrying out a specific partial processing step (2) of an overall processing step of the forage harvesting process chain (13), - an assistance system (32a ... 32n) assigned to each machine (31) for controlling the respective machine (31), wherein the respective assistance system (32a ... 32n) forms an independently operating control unit (45a ... 45n) with the respective machine (31) provided for carrying out the partial processing steps (2) and/or its working elements, which serves to optimize the control of the respective machine (31) for carrying out the specific partial processing step (2), wherein the system (1) includes a process supervisor (47) as a higher-level control unit of the control units (45a ...45n) includes, which controls the individual control machines (45a ... 45n) and that the assistance systems (32a ... 32n) of the control machines (45a ... 45n) are connected to the process supervisor (47) for data exchange among themselves via a communication means (48).