Agricultural Tool Depth Control via Load Cell Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural machines, particularly rotary harrrows, lack efficient systems for controlling working depth and tool wear, requiring manual adjustment and user expertise, which affects processing quality and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An electronic control and command system that uses sensors and load cells to measure and adjust the working depth and wear of tools in real-time, allowing for direct control from a tractor monitor, enabling precise management of tool depth and load distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual adjustment and user expertise are used for controlling working depth and tool wear, then the system remains simple, but processing quality and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service by implementing automatic monitoring and control functions through electronic sensors and microprocessors. The working depth sensors (ultrasonic, inductive, or capacitive) automatically detect tool position and wear without manual intervention, and the microprocessor-controlled hydraulic system automatically adjusts tool depth based on sensor feedback, eliminating the need for constant manual adjustment while maintaining simple overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with electronic sensing and control systems. Instead of relying on user expertise and manual depth control, the system uses electronic sensors (ultrasonic, inductive, capacitive) to detect tool position and wear, and uses microprocessor-controlled hydraulic actuators to automatically adjust working depth, substituting mechanical manual control with automated electronic systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If electronic sensors and actuators are added to control working depth and tool wear, then control precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking depth measurement precisionVSAvoidelectronic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by using a single microprocessor unit that controls multiple functions: it processes signals from various types of sensors (ultrasonic, inductive, capacitive), controls hydraulic actuators for depth adjustment, monitors tool wear, and manages different sensor types interchangeably. This universal control approach allows precise measurement and control while keeping the electronic system architecture relatively simple through consolidation of control functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by using multiple types of sensors (ultrasonic, inductive, capacitive) that can be interchangeably installed to detect the same physical parameter (tool depth and position). Each sensor type operates on different physical principles but achieves the same measurement function, allowing the system to maintain measurement precision while providing flexibility in sensor selection and installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time monitoring and automatic control are implemented, then processing quality improves, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing qualityVSAvoidmanual control ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring tool working depth through sensors and automatically adjusting the hydraulic system to maintain the desired depth. The microprocessor receives sensor signals, processes them, and sends control commands to hydraulic actuators to maintain precise working depth without requiring manual intervention, thereby improving processing quality while the automated nature actually simplifies operation for the user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If multiple sensor types are used for measuring working depth, then measurement reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a single sensor mounting position that can accommodate multiple types of sensors (ultrasonic, inductive, capacitive). The microprocessor is programmed to handle signals from any of these sensor types interchangeably, allowing the system to maintain measurement reliability through sensor redundancy while keeping the overall sensor system architecture simple through standardized mounting and universal control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise control of working depth and tool wear, improving processing efficiency and reducing manual intervention, enhancing the versatility and effectiveness of agricultural machines.

Implementation Method 1

a first sensor, preferably of ultrasonic type, is used to detect a position of the leveling bar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 2

one or more load cells, preferably of piezoresistive type, positioned between the leveling bar and the supports

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 3

an angular sensor (not shown), which allows the user to adjust the machine in a horizontal position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInclinometer:

Data Source

PatentEP3598880B1Control and command system and method for agricultural machines
Publication Date: 2022.05.25 TORRICO
  • EP3598880B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3598880B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3598880B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control and command system for agricultural machines, wherein the agricultural machine has a supporting frame (14), a series of tools (10) adapted for shredding the ground in depth, which are connected to a roller (11), said roller (11) being smooth or provided with spikes (16), and a refining or leveling bar (15), configured to hold the ground inside a machine working chamber to increase the refinement of the worked soil, said bar (15) being fixed parallel to the roller (11) and being adjustable in height with respect to a surface level of the ground (T); a load detectable by one or more load cells (CC), which are placed between the refining bar (15) and a series of supports, is positioned on said refining bar (15). The load changes on the basis of the type of the soil to be worked.