Agricultural Machine Vision Control for Unforeseen Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural machine monitoring systems are limited by the need for extensive training on predefined object classes, failing to detect unforeseen objects in highly unstructured environments, which can lead to increased operator workload and potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

A control system utilizing an autoencoder architecture that maps image data to a lower-dimensional feature space, allowing for the detection of anomalies by comparing reconstructed images with input images, and generating control signals to manage machine operations based on anomaly maps, reducing the need for extensive training on multiple object classes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If object detection algorithms are trained on predefined object classes, then detection accuracy for common objects is improved, but the system fails to detect unforeseen objects in unstructured environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection of unforeseen objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of training the system to detect specific objects (forward approach), the patent inverts the approach by training the system to recognize normal environments and detecting anomalies as deviations from normality. This allows the system to identify unforeseen objects without requiring pre-training on their specific classes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The anomaly detection system provides universal detection capability across all object types and environments. A single trained model can detect any deviation from normal conditions, making the system adaptable to unforeseen objects without requiring retraining on specific object classes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If extensive training data from multiple object classes is used, then detection coverage is improved, but computational requirements and training time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidcomputational power
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential features of normal environments during training, discarding the need to learn specific object classes. This extraction of normality patterns reduces the dimensionality and complexity of the training data while maintaining detection coverage for unforeseen objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the training parameter from learning object-specific features to learning environmental normality patterns. This parameter change reduces computational requirements while maintaining or improving detection coverage, as the system only needs to learn what is normal rather than cataloging every possible object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional object detection systems are used, then common objects are detected reliably, but operator workload increases and trust decreases due to missed anomalies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The anomaly detection system performs self-verification by comparing actual sensor data against learned normal patterns, automatically identifying deviations without requiring operator interpretation. This self-service capability reduces operator workload while improving reliability through consistent anomaly identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to operators by highlighting only anomalous conditions that require attention, rather than requiring operators to monitor all sensor data. This feedback mechanism improves reliability by ensuring anomalies are caught while reducing operator workload by filtering out normal variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230278550A1Monitoring Agricultural Operations
Publication Date: 2023.09.07 AGCO INT GMBH
  • US20230278550A1 patent drawing
  • US20230278550A1 patent drawing
  • US20230278550A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for monitoring operation of an agricultural machine. Image data indicative of an input image of a working environment of the agricultural machine is receive and encoded utilizing an encoder network to map the image data to a lower-dimensional feature space. The encoded data is then decoded form a reconstructed image of the working environment which is compared with the input image to identify anomalies within the working environment. One or more operable components associated with the machine may be controlled based on the identification of one or more anomalies.