Autonomous Guided Vehicles for Airport Baggage Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional baggage handling systems at airports face inefficiencies due to mechanical failures, lack of flexibility, and high manual intervention, especially in sorting and loading bags into containers, leading to delays and underutilization of resources.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a transit baggage handling system utilizing automated guided vehicles (AGVs) that autonomously transfer and sort bags based on coded tags, using a central control system to guide AGVs through the airport, allowing for flexible routing and efficient loading into containers, either fully automated or with manual assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional conveyor systems are used for baggage handling, then bags can be transported through security screening and to departure gates, but the system lacks flexibility to re-route bags when mechanical failures occur, leading to system shutdown and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidrouting flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic, reconfigurable routing paths using autonomous guided vehicles (AGVs) that can adapt their trajectories in real-time. Multiple possible paths are established between check-in, security screening, and departure gates, allowing the system to dynamically reroute bags when mechanical failures or security issues occur, eliminating the single-point-of-failure constraint of conventional fixed conveyor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces AGVs as intermediary transport units between fixed infrastructure points (check-in counters, security screens, gates). These AGVs act as flexible mediators that can navigate alternative routes around obstacles or failures, providing routing adaptability while maintaining connection between fixed system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If conventional conveyor systems with security screening are used, then bags can be screened for security, but the one-way pathway design reduces screening efficiency and leads to underutilized screening devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity screening capabilityVSAvoidscreening efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic routing where bags can be redirected to alternative security screening paths based on device availability and throughput requirements. Multiple security screening devices are distributed along different possible paths, allowing the system to utilize all screening devices effectively rather than leaving them underutilized due to fixed one-way routing constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the system so that multiple security screening devices can handle bags from different routing paths. Each screening device serves multiple potential routing scenarios, increasing overall system productivity and eliminating underutilization that occurs in conventional single-path designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual bag handling is used for loading into ULDs, then bags can be loaded despite size and shape variations, but the process is highly manual-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling capability for varied bag sizesVSAvoidloading speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated loading systems where AGVs autonomously navigate to loading positions and transfer bags to ULDs without manual intervention. The system uses sensors and control algorithms to adapt to bag size and shape variations, enabling automated handling that maintains versatility while dramatically increasing loading speed and reducing manual labor intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling with automated control systems that use sensors, algorithms, and automated guidance to manage bag loading. This substitution maintains the ability to handle varied bag sizes through intelligent control while eliminating the time-consuming nature of manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If ramp-level sorting is performed in harsh environmental conditions, then bags can be sorted for specific flights, but the harsh conditions take a toll on human bag handlers and equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capabilityVSAvoidenvironmental harshness impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces AGVs as intermediary transport units that operate in the harsh ramp environment, shielding human operators from direct exposure to extreme conditions. The AGVs handle bag transport and sorting operations in harsh environments, while human operators work from protected control areas, significantly reducing the toll of environmental harshness on personnel and equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11577858B2Baggage and parcel handling system
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 LEIDOS SECURITY DETECTION & AUTOMATION U K LTD
  • US11577858B2 patent drawing
  • US11577858B2 patent drawing
  • US11577858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bag handling system for a mass transit environment is disclosed. The bag handling system includes a first set of autonomous automated guided vehicles and a second set of autonomous automated guided vehicles. The first and second sets of autonomous automated guided vehicles are configured to transport bags through one or more bag processing areas.