AGV Synchronized Travel via Dynamic Spacing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automatic guided vehicles (AGVs) lack the capability to coordinate synchronized movement in manufacturing operations, similar to traditional conveyor systems, due to issues with timing and spacing, which is crucial for consistent material handling and manufacturing processes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing multiple AGVs with controllers, communication, and guidance systems to determine and maintain a synchronized travel path, with lead and last AGVs, and adjusting speeds to maintain designated spacing, allowing for coordinated movement without the need for traditional conveyor systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional conveyor systems are used to provide consistent work flow, then manufacturing reliability and consistency are improved, but installation cost and device complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing consistencyVSAvoidconveyor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The conveyor system is segmented into multiple independent AGV units, each capable of autonomous navigation and workpiece transport. Instead of one complex conveyor system, multiple simple AGVs work in coordination, reducing individual unit complexity while maintaining overall system reliability through distributed operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical conveyor infrastructure (chains, belts, tracks) is replaced with autonomous vehicles using guidance systems (optical, magnetic, or laser-based). This substitution eliminates the need for permanent mechanical installation while achieving comparable work flow consistency through electronic control and autonomous navigation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional conveyor systems are installed permanently into the facility, then consistent work flow is achieved, but flexibility for reconfiguration is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework flow consistencyVSAvoidreconfiguration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static conveyor infrastructure to dynamic AGV units that can change their paths and routes. The AGVs navigate using flexible guidance systems that allow reconfiguration of travel paths by simply updating navigation instructions rather than physical reinstallation, maintaining work flow consistency through adaptive route planning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses changeable navigation parameters (optical markers, magnetic field configurations, laser guidance patterns) to define AGV paths. By changing these parameters rather than physical infrastructure, the system achieves reconfiguration flexibility while maintaining reliable work flow through consistent navigation and spacing control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If AGVs are used for material handling without synchronized coordination, then operational flexibility is improved, but manufacturing consistency deteriorates due to timing and spacing issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements inter-AGV communication and coordination protocols where each AGV reports its position, speed, and status to the system controller. The controller provides feedback commands to adjust spacing and timing, ensuring consistent work flow while maintaining operational flexibility through adaptive coordination rather than rigid synchronization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The AGV system uses universal communication protocols and coordination mechanisms that allow different AGV units to work together consistently. The same navigation and control principles apply to all AGVs regardless of their specific routes or tasks, enabling both flexibility in individual operation and consistency in coordinated manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8761989B1Method of material handling with automatic guided vehicles
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 WEBB JERVIS B CO
  • US8761989B1 patent drawing
  • US8761989B1 patent drawing
  • US8761989B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of automatic guided vehicles that are capable of providing synchronized travel along a line or path such that regular manufacturing operations may be performed to material or workpieces on the vehicle without the need for a traditional conveyor systems.