Autonomous AGV Gate Synchronization Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing operation control systems for self-propelled carrier bodies, such as AGVs, face issues with radio interference, positional information errors, and centralized control failures, leading to synchronization problems with transport bodies, which can cause production delays and congestion.

Innovation Solution

An operation control system with parallel transport lines, where AGVs are equipped with obstacle sensors and autonomous traveling control units, and gates that move based on detector signals to maintain a safe distance and synchronize with transport bodies, preventing collisions and improving synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wireless communication and centralized control computer are used to control AGVs, then AGV operation can be coordinated, but the system becomes vulnerable to radio interference, positional information errors, and centralized control failures

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAGV operation reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized control system is segmented into distributed autonomous control units, with each AGV equipped with its own obstacle sensor and autonomous traveling control unit. This distributes the control function from a single centralized computer to multiple independent units, eliminating the single point of failure and radio interference vulnerabilities while maintaining coordination through standardized gate control protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each AGV is equipped with autonomous traveling control that enables it to independently detect obstacles and control its own travel without relying on continuous centralized commands. The AGV autonomously responds to gate positions and obstacle detections, serving its own control needs while integrating with the overall system through standardized interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If AGV travels at high speed to improve production efficiency, then productivity increases, but the risk of collision with obstacles or other AGVs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcollision prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The obstacle sensor is positioned to detect obstacles at a distance before the AGV reaches them, and the autonomous traveling control unit calculates and applies braking forces in advance to ensure the AGV can stop safely within the available distance. This preliminary detection and action allow high-speed operation while maintaining safe stopping margins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The obstacle sensor continuously provides feedback about the distance to obstacles, and the autonomous traveling control unit adjusts the AGV's speed and braking force in real-time based on this feedback. The gate position feedback enables dynamic speed adjustment to maintain safe separation distances while maximizing travel speed for productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If AGV travels in synchronization with transport body to reduce assembly time, then assembly efficiency improves, but the control system becomes more complex to maintain precise positioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly timeVSAvoidsynchronization control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate serves as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between the AGV and the transport body synchronization requirements. By controlling gate positions and using them as reference points, the system achieves precise synchronization without requiring complex direct coordination between AGV and transport body, simplifying the overall control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex centralized electronic control and wireless communication for synchronization with a simpler mechanical gate-based reference system. The gate's physical position provides a tangible synchronization reference that the autonomous AGV can detect and use to align with transport bodies, reducing electronic complexity while achieving precise timing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11009883B2Operation control system
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 MAZDA MOTOR CORP
  • US11009883B2 patent drawing
  • US11009883B2 patent drawing
  • US11009883B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An operation control system includes: a first detector that detects a transport body that has reached a predetermined reference position on a first transport line; an obstacle sensor and an autonomous traveling control unit provided in each of a plurality of self-propelled carrier bodies traveling on a second transport line; a gate provided on the second transport line; and a gate driving unit that moves the gate to a retracted position when the first detector detects the transport body, and moves the gate to an advanced position when the first detector does not detect the transport body. The autonomous traveling control unit controls the travel of the carrier bodies such that a forward separation distance, a distance between any of the carrier bodies and another carrier body or an obstacle ahead of the carrier body, is equal to or greater than a predetermined collision prevention distance.