AGV Parking Point Scheduling for Balanced Warehouse Dispatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack an effective way to schedule automated guided vehicles (AGVs) in human-machine collaborative order picking modes, leading to inefficiencies in warehousing operations due to the lack of a systematic approach for allocating AGVs to temporary parking points.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for scheduling AGVs that involve acquiring information about temporary parking points and AGVs, calculating the number of missing vehicles at each point, filtering out idle or unavailable points, and scheduling AGVs to a target point based on the number of missing vehicles, considering factors like time consumption and task boxes to be conveyed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual order picking and cart pushing is used, then flexibility in handling task boxes is maintained, but time consumption and physical strength requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical strength requirementVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated guided vehicles to autonomously navigate, transport task boxes, and return to parking points without human intervention. The AGVs self-manage their routes, task box handling, and positioning, eliminating the need for manual cart pushing while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable navigation and adaptive route planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical system of cart pushing with an automated guided vehicle system that uses sensors, controllers, and automated navigation. The mechanical action of human-powered cart transport is substituted with automated vehicles equipped with guidance systems, task box grippers, and autonomous navigation capabilities, significantly reducing physical strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If AGV vehicles are deployed for conveying task boxes, then operating efficiency improves, but the lack of effective scheduling methods leads to suboptimal resource allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling system pre-calculates optimal parking points for AGV vehicles based on current task box locations, delivery line port status, and vehicle availability. By performing scheduling computations in advance rather than reactively, the system optimizes resource allocation before AGVs need to be dispatched, improving operating efficiency while managing complexity through proactive planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the status of AGV vehicles, task box locations, and delivery line port conditions, using this feedback to dynamically adjust scheduling decisions. The scheduling method incorporates real-time status information to optimize vehicle allocation to parking points, ensuring that the system adapts to changing conditions while maintaining efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If AGV vehicles are scheduled to temporary parking points without systematic methods, then vehicle deployment is simplified, but imbalances between idle and busy points increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle deployment simplicityVSAvoidbalance between idle and busy points
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling system dynamically adjusts parameters such as parking point selection, vehicle assignment, and task box allocation based on real-time system conditions. By changing these parameters systematically according to measured imbalances between idle and busy points, the method maintains simplicity in vehicle deployment while stabilizing the overall system composition and preventing extreme imbalances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling method transitions from static vehicle deployment to dynamic allocation, where parking point assignments and vehicle routes are continuously adjusted based on current system state. This dynamic approach allows the system to respond to changing conditions while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making, balancing the distribution of AGVs across different parking points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12039472B2Method and device for scheduling automated guided vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 BEIJING JINGDONG QIANSHITECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US12039472B2 patent drawing
  • US12039472B2 patent drawing
  • US12039472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and device for scheduling automated guided vehicles. One method includes acquiring, based on a task for scheduling automated guided vehicles, information of a set of temporary parking points and information of automated guided vehicles; calculating, based on the information of the set of temporary parking points and the information of automated guided vehicles, the number of missing vehicles at each temporary parking point in the set of temporary parking point; selecting, based on the number of missing vehicles, a target temporary parking point from the set of temporary parking points, and scheduling the automated guided vehicles to be scheduled to the target temporary parking point.