AGV Speed Control via Sensor Feedback and Watchdog Timer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) often collide with users or objects due to inadequate speed control, leading to damage or injury, as existing systems lack effective methods to adjust speed based on user presence and sensor functionality.

Innovation Solution

A control method for AGVs that includes a sensor, watchdog timer, and alarm system, which detects user presence and adjusts speed between two levels (first and second speeds) based on sensor state, with recovery operations to ensure safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the AGV operates at high speed to improve productivity, then productivity increases, but collision risk with users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating speedVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The AGV dynamically adjusts its operating speed based on real-time sensor feedback about user presence. When users are detected in the operation area, the system automatically reduces speed from first speed to second speed, creating a dynamic speed control mechanism that balances productivity and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor user presence and door status, the controller processes this information, and the motor controller adjusts speed accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures the AGV responds appropriately to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the AGV operates at high speed to improve efficiency, then operation efficiency increases, but braking distance increases leading to safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation efficiencyVSAvoidbraking distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts speed based on operational context. By operating at second speed when users are present or doors are open, the braking distance is naturally reduced, allowing the AGV to stop safely within shorter distances while maintaining efficient operation at first speed when conditions permit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the AGV reduces speed to improve safety, then collision risk decreases, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision riskVSAvoidoperating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The AGV employs dynamic speed adjustment rather than operating at a fixed low speed. It maintains first speed for efficient operation when safe, and transitions to second speed only when necessary for safety, optimizing the balance between productivity and safety based on real-time conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the speed parameter based on detected conditions. By monitoring user presence and door status, the controller adjusts the speed parameter between two discrete values, allowing the AGV to maintain high productivity when safe while ensuring safety when users are present

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the system frequently adjusts speed to improve safety response, then safety reliability increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: sensors for detection, controller for decision-making, and motor controller for execution. This modular architecture manages complexity by dividing the control function into manageable, independent components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses discrete parameter changes between two speed levels rather than continuous adjustment, simplifying the control logic. The controller transitions between first speed and second speed based on clear conditional thresholds, reducing the complexity of control algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240402731A1Automated guided vehicle and control method for automated guided system including the same
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US20240402731A1 patent drawing
  • US20240402731A1 patent drawing
  • US20240402731A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a control method for an automated guided system including a step of providing an automated guided vehicle including a sensor and a watchdog timer, a controller, and an alarm, an initializing step of initializing a count value, a first checking step of checking an abnormal state of the sensor, a count increasing step of increasing the count value, and a step of performing a recovery operation, the step of performing the recovery operation includes a second checking step of rechecking the abnormal state, a step of turning on the alarm; a third checking step of rechecking the abnormal state, and a step of turning off the alarm.