AGV Fleet Traffic Control for Worker-Aware Speed and Stop Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inventory management systems face inefficiencies and safety concerns due to the interference between autonomous vehicles and entities within the system, leading to reduced throughput, long response times, and potential safety hazards during maintenance or navigation.

Innovation Solution

An entity monitoring safety feature that utilizes transmitters and receivers to provide slow and stop signals to autonomous vehicles, ensuring safe passage for entities by reducing or stopping vehicle movement, and dynamically adjusting paths to avoid congestion and ensure entity safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles operate at normal speed throughout the inventory management system, then productivity and throughput are maximized, but safety hazards arise when entities (maintenance workers, pedestrians) are present in the system

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicles dynamically adjust their operating speed based on real-time detection of entities in the workspace. When no entities are detected, vehicles operate at normal speed to maximize productivity. When entities are detected, vehicles automatically reduce speed or stop to ensure safety, then resume normal operation after the entity leaves the workspace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the workspace for entity presence and provides feedback to the autonomous vehicle control system. This feedback loop enables real-time speed adjustments - vehicles receive information about detected entities and automatically modify their speed accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that balances safety and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If autonomous vehicles stop completely when entities are detected, then safety is ensured, but system efficiency and throughput decrease due to unnecessary stops

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The safety response is applied locally and selectively - only autonomous vehicles whose paths intersect with the detected entity's workspace are affected. Other vehicles continue operating at normal speed without interruption. The system also applies graduated responses (slow down vs. stop) based on the specific situation, rather than uniform stopping for all vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the speed parameter of affected vehicles dynamically based on entity detection. Instead of binary stop/go commands, the system adjusts speed as a continuous parameter - vehicles may slow down to a reduced speed when entities are nearby, or stop completely only when necessary. This parameter-based control optimizes both safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the entire warehouse is shut down for maintenance or repairs, then safety is ensured for maintenance workers, but productivity and throughput drop to zero

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicles are equipped with self-diagnostic capabilities and can autonomously navigate to maintenance areas or service stations when needed. The system allows selective maintenance of individual vehicles without requiring shutdown of the entire fleet, enabling continuous operation of other vehicles while maintenance is performed on specific units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The maintenance system is segmented to allow individual vehicle maintenance rather than system-wide shutdown. Each autonomous vehicle can be taken offline for maintenance independently while other vehicles continue operating. The workspace is also segmented into maintenance zones where vehicles can be serviced without affecting other operational areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3500901B1Management system for a fleet of agvs and traffic management method
Publication Date: 2021.10.06 AMAZON TECH INC
  • EP3500901B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3500901B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3500901B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Instructions may be received by a computer system of an autonomous vehicle that identify a path to move inventory within a materials handling facility. Further, the computer system of the autonomous vehicle may reduce a current traveling speed of the autonomous vehicle in response to receiving a first signal that is provided by a transmitter coupled with an entity moving with the materials handling facility. The first signal may be provided up to a first distance from the entity. In embodiments, the computer system of the autonomous vehicle may stop movement of the autonomous vehicle in response to receiving a second signal provided by the transmitter coupled with the entity. The second signal may be provided up to a second distance from the entity that is less than the first distance.