AGV Travel Area Control for Variable Warehouse Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automated warehouse systems face inefficiencies due to varying operating statuses of automated guided vehicles and stations, leading to unprocessed transport commands, increased vehicle numbers, and reduced transport efficiency, especially when operating ratios change.

Innovation Solution

A controller determines travel areas for automated guided vehicles based on the operating status of automated warehouses and stations, adjusting area sizes to balance vehicle operations and optimize transport efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the travel area is fixed and determined in advance, then the automated guided vehicle operates with a stable route, but the transport capacity cannot be fully used when operating status changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute stabilityVSAvoidtransport capacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the travel area variable rather than fixed. The controller dynamically adjusts the travel area boundaries based on real-time operating status of automated warehouses and stations. When demand increases, the travel area expands to include more warehouses/stations; when demand decreases, it contracts. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by maintaining route stability through controlled changes rather than arbitrary reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of travel area size based on operating status. The controller monitors the number of automated warehouses and stations in operation, then adjusts the travel area parameter accordingly. This parameter change allows the system to adapt to varying demand levels, ensuring high transport capacity utilization while maintaining operational stability through systematic adjustment rather than chaos.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If many automated guided vehicles travel between the automated warehouse and the station, then the transport capacity increases, but collision avoidance requires longer routes and waiting time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport capacityVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the overall travel route into multiple travel areas based on operating status. When many automated guided vehicles are operating, the system divides the area into smaller zones, allowing vehicles to operate in parallel without conflict. This segmentation reduces waiting time and collision risks while maintaining high transport capacity through coordinated multi-zone operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces spatial dimensionality by creating multiple travel areas at different locations. Instead of all vehicles sharing a single congested route, vehicles are distributed across multiple spatial zones. This dimensional approach allows simultaneous operations in different areas, reducing waiting time while maintaining overall transport capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the travel area is enlarged to handle more transport commands, then the transport capacity increases, but the operating status of automated guided vehicles becomes more sensitive to warehouse and station status changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport capacityVSAvoidoperating status sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the travel area dynamically adjustable rather than fixed. When operating status changes occur in automated warehouses or stations, the controller automatically adjusts the travel area boundaries and reassigns vehicles. This dynamic response reduces sensitivity to status changes by adapting the system configuration to match current operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control where the controller continuously monitors the operating status of automated warehouses and stations, then adjusts travel area configuration accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows the system to respond to status changes systematically, maintaining optimal transport capacity while adapting to varying operational conditions rather than being overly sensitive to individual changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12397990B2Automated warehouse system, and control method for automated warehouse system
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 MURATA MASCH LTD
  • US12397990B2 patent drawing
  • US12397990B2 patent drawing
  • US12397990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated warehouse system includes automated warehouses, work stations, a travel route, automated guided vehicles, and a controller. The travel route is accessible to the automated warehouses and the work stations. The automated guided vehicles travel along the travel route. The controller determines an area including at least a portion of the travel route as a travel area in which the automated guided vehicle travels, and controls the automated guided vehicle to transport an article between the automated warehouse and the work stations belonging to the travel area. The controller determines size of the travel area, in which the automated guided vehicle travels, based on the operating status of at least one of the automated warehouse and the work station.