AI Accelerator Reuse Data Management for Memory Access Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI hardware accelerators face challenges in efficiently managing memory access costs and optimizing reuse data to minimize external memory accesses during workload processing.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves an operation method for an AI accelerator that determines reuse data based on hardware resource information and memory access costs, storing this data in a multilevel memory to reduce external memory accesses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If reuse data is determined based on hardware resource information and memory access cost, then external memory access is minimized, but computation overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal memory accessVSAvoidcomputation overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of hardware resource information and memory access costs before executing workloads to determine reuse data. This advance preparation allows the accelerator to identify which data should be retained in multilevel memory, avoiding costly external memory accesses during actual computation without adding overhead during runtime execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The accelerator automatically determines reuse data by analyzing its own hardware resource information and memory access costs without requiring external intervention. The system self-optimizes by identifying patterns in its own operation, determining which intermediate values should be cached in multilevel memory based on its specific hardware characteristics and workload patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of energy

If multilevel memory is used to store reuse data, then external memory access cost is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory access costVSAvoidmemory hierarchy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory system is segmented into multiple levels (L0, L1, L2) with different access characteristics and capacities. Each memory level serves a specific purpose: L0 for fast per-element storage, L1 for shared workspace, and L2 for larger reuse data storage. This segmentation allows the system to optimize for different types of memory access patterns without requiring a completely complex unified memory architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different memory levels are assigned different qualities and characteristics appropriate to their function. L0 memory provides fastest access for individual processing elements, L1 provides medium-speed shared access for groups of elements, and L2 provides slower but larger-capacity storage for reuse data. Each memory level is optimized locally for its specific access patterns and performance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If reuse data is dynamically determined based on workload characteristics, then processing efficiency is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the accelerator continuously monitors hardware resource usage and memory access patterns during workload execution. Based on this feedback, the system dynamically adjusts which data should be classified as reuse data and stored in multilevel memory, optimizing performance for different workload characteristics without requiring complex manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The reuse data determination is made dynamic rather than static, allowing the system to adapt to different workload characteristics. The accelerator can identify patterns in different types of AI workloads (e.g., convolution operations, matrix multiplications) and automatically adjust which intermediate values should be retained in multilevel memory based on the specific characteristics of the current workload being executed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3872638B1Operation method of an accelerator and system including the same
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP3872638B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3872638B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3872638B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An accelerator, an operation method of the accelerator, and an accelerator system including the accelerator are disclosed. The operation method includes receiving one or more workloads assigned by a host controller, determining reuse data of the workloads based on hardware resource information and/or a memory access cost of the accelerator when a plurality of processing units included in the accelerator performs the workloads, and providing a result of performing the workloads.