AI Access Checking for Multi-Resource Permission Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems lack an efficient and reliable method for managing complex data access permissions across multiple resources and repositories, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors in access control management.

Innovation Solution

A data-access management system utilizing an AI model, such as a large language model (LLM), to generate and manage access controls, check permissions, and provide explanations for access decisions, integrating role-based, attribute-based, and classification-based access controls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional systems are used for managing data access permissions, then implementation is simpler, but reliability and accuracy of access control management deteriorates due to inefficiencies and potential errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control management reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an AI model as an intermediary component between users and data resources. This AI model automatically checks access permissions by analyzing user identities, resource requirements, and policy rules, thereby improving access control reliability without requiring complex manual management systems. The AI model acts as a smart mediator that handles the complexity of permission verification internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service access control checking where the AI model autonomously evaluates permission requests without human intervention. The model automatically determines whether users have adequate access rights by processing their identities and resource requirements against stored policies, eliminating the need for manual access control management and reducing errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual methods are used for checking access permissions, then system complexity is lower, but productivity and efficiency deteriorates due to time-consuming verification processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess permission checking efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of access permission checking with an AI-based automated system. The AI model processes permission requests by analyzing user identities, resource requirements, and policy rules computationally, dramatically improving checking efficiency. This substitution of mechanical manual verification with intelligent automated processing eliminates time-consuming human review while managing complexity through algorithmic approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If detailed access control management is implemented across multiple resources, then security improves, but ease of operation deteriorates due to complex permission tracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata access securityVSAvoidaccess control management ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex task of access control management from human operators and encapsulates it within the AI model. The model internally handles the intricate analysis of user identities, resource requirements, and policy rules, presenting a simplified interface to users. This extraction of complexity into the automated system maintains high security through detailed permission tracking while improving ease of operation by eliminating manual management burdens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250371182A1Systems and methods for access checking
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250371182A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371182A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371182A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, systems and methods for checking data access are provided. For example, a method includes: receiving a checking request about a user, the checking request including a user identifier of the user and a resource indication of a resource; determining one or more components referenced by the resource; for each component of the one or more components referenced by the resource, determining permission information indicating whether the user access to at least a part of the one or more components; and determining permission information indicating whether the user is permitted to access the resource.