AI Advisory Platform Data Authentication via Expert Database

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Accurate selection and authentication of data entries for artificial intelligence platforms are challenging, leading to inaccurate or uninformative results due to the inclusion of incorrect data.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that involve a processor connected to a memory, receiving advisory inputs from an advisor client device, retrieving a best practices training set from an expert database, classifying inquiries, identifying expected responses, authenticating advisory inputs, and updating the database to ensure accurate data entry and authentication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If data entries are selected without strict authentication, then the processing speed and ease of operation improve, but the accuracy and reliability of AI results deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of data entryVSAvoidaccuracy of AI results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication of data entries before they are incorporated into the AI platform. An authentication module verifies each data entry against predefined criteria and an expert database before acceptance, ensuring that only validated data enters the system. This preliminary action prevents inaccurate data from compromising AI results while maintaining a streamlined data collection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where authentication results are communicated back to the data entry process. When data entries fail authentication, the system provides feedback indicating the specific issues and requires correction before re-submission. This closed-loop feedback ensures continuous improvement of data quality while maintaining operational efficiency through clear guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If strict authentication of data entries is implemented, then the accuracy and reliability of AI results improve, but the complexity of the system and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of AI resultsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary authentication module that acts as a mediator between data entry and the AI processing system. This module contains an expert database with pre-stored authentication criteria and automatically evaluates incoming data against these criteria. By placing this intermediary layer, the system maintains simplicity in the core AI functionality while implementing robust authentication without requiring complex integration into the AI engine itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If strict authentication of data entries is implemented, then the accuracy and reliability of AI results improve, but the time required for data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of AI resultsVSAvoidtime for data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication of data entries before they are incorporated into the AI platform. An authentication module verifies each data entry against predefined criteria and an expert database before acceptance, ensuring that only validated data enters the system. This preliminary action prevents inaccurate data from compromising AI results while maintaining a streamlined data collection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication module implements a tiered verification approach where data entries are subjected to different levels of scrutiny based on their source, type, and confidence score. High-confidence entries from verified sources undergo minimal verification, while uncertain entries receive more extensive validation. This partial action approach maintains high accuracy standards while reducing unnecessary time consumption on already-validated data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12087442B2Methods and systems for confirming an advisory interaction with an artificial intelligence platform
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US12087442B2 patent drawing
  • US12087442B2 patent drawing
  • US12087442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for confirming an advisory interaction with an artificial intelligence platform. The system includes a constitutional generator module configured to receive a first advisory input, retrieve an expert input, select a machine-learning process as a function of the expert input, and generate a therapeutic corrector. The system includes a constitutional advisory module configured to display a therapeutic corrector on a graphical user interface and receive a second advisory input. The system includes a best practices module the best practices module designed and configured to retrieve from an expert database a best practices training set, calculate an optimal vector output, generate an optimal vector output containing an expected therapeutic corrector implementation response, authenticate a second advisory input, and update the best practices module.