AI Agent Adversarial Training for Automated User Negotiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional online systems require users to individually search and decide on products, lacking the ability to negotiate with retailers, making the process time-intensive and limiting to binary purchase decisions, and existing machine-learned models struggle to effectively address diverse negotiation strategies.

Innovation Solution

Adversarial training of AI agents, specifically through adversarial training, where the system AI agents and user AI agents are trained using pre-defined constraints and objectives, enabling them to negotiate on behalf of users and the online system, facilitating efficient and dynamic interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional online systems present products to users for individual selection, then users can make purchase decisions, but the process becomes time-intensive and users lack negotiation capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of purchaseVSAvoidtime for product search and decision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs AI agents that autonomously negotiate with retailers on behalf of users, eliminating the need for users to manually search and decide on each product. The AI agents independently engage in multi-turn negotiations, adjust strategies, and secure deals, allowing users to benefit from negotiated prices without investing time in the negotiation process themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If machine-learned models are used to act on behalf of retailers, then automation is improved, but training difficulty increases due to diverse negotiation strategies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of negotiationVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-trains AI agents using adversarial examples that incorporate diverse negotiation strategies and tactics before deployment. By anticipating and preparing for various negotiation scenarios in advance, the system reduces the complexity of real-time training and enables the AI agents to handle diverse negotiation situations effectively without requiring complex ongoing training mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20260065140A1Adversarial training of artificial intelligence agents
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US20260065140A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065140A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065140A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system artificial intelligence (AI) agent is trained to act on behalf of an online system. The system AI agent comprises a large language model that has been pre-trained using a set of system constraints and a set of system objectives. The system AI agent is trained adversarially using training service requests from a plurality of different user AI agents of different types to determine resolutions to the training service requests. Once trained, the system AI agent may determine resolutions to service requests of users of the online system. In some embodiments, the system agent may determine the resolutions via messaging with user AI agents that represent the users. The online system may further train the system AI agent (and in some embodiments the user AI agents) based in part on the resolutions to the service requests.