AI Agent Orchestration for Missing-Data Dialogue Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI applications struggle with handling incomplete and ambiguous data, leading to inaccurate responses, frustration, and resource wastage, and are inflexible in dynamic interactions, requiring complex and costly BPM processes and lacking the ability to retrieve missing information from users or APIs.

Innovation Solution

A system that dynamically loads required functions based on user intent, interacts in natural language to request clarification, and uses an API repository for information retrieval, enabling adaptive and efficient computational inference processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If AI applications assume or guess data when uncertain, then processing speed is improved, but accuracy and user trust deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidaccuracy and user trust
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-correction mechanisms where the AI model generates initial responses, evaluates their quality against predefined criteria, and automatically refines them through iterative processing. This self-service approach allows the system to maintain high processing speeds while ensuring accuracy through built-in validation and correction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where the output of the AI model is evaluated by a quality assessment module. When responses fail to meet accuracy thresholds, the system feeds this information back to the model for regeneration. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable and accurate responses without significantly impacting processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If BPM processes are implemented to manage dialogue, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedialogue management reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal AI model that can handle multiple functions including dialogue management, information retrieval, and response generation. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate BPM processes and specialized modules, reducing system complexity while maintaining reliable dialogue management through the model's inherent capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If complete data gathering is required before processing, then accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoiddata gathering time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively retrieving available information from databases and external sources before user queries are fully processed. This advance preparation ensures that when data is needed, it is already available, maintaining high response accuracy without adding delays during actual user interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial data gathering by retrieving only the essential information needed to answer user queries, rather than collecting all possible data. This selective approach maintains response accuracy by focusing on critical data points while significantly reducing the time required for information gathering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If AI models process all available functions, then versatility is improved, but use of energy and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunction processing capabilityVSAvoidprocessing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments available functions into categories and only activates the specific segments needed for each user query. This selective function activation allows the AI model to maintain versatility by having access to all functions while reducing resource consumption by processing only the relevant subset for each interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260056987A1Systems and methods for orchestrating interaction with an artificial intelligence application
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
  • US20260056987A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056987A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056987A1 patent drawing

AI summary

receive, via an artificial intelligence (AI) agent, a first message from a user; generate an initial computational inference process based at least in part on the first message; determine whether or not all information required to execute the initial computational inference process is available to the processor; when a determination is made that all information required to execute the initial computational inference process is available: execute the initial computational inference process; generate a first reply based on the initial computational inference process; and send the first reply to the user via the AI agent; and when a determination is made that not all information required to execute the initial computational inference process is available: generate a first query requesting the unavailable information from the user; and send the first query to the user via the AI agent.