AI Agent Communication Tiers for Mission-Relevant Scene Exchange

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication infrastructures between AI agents at perception, cognition, and decision tiers are unsuitable due to independent study of non-text signal and semantic communication, lacking synergistic efforts, and state-of-the-art signal quality measures fail to quantify pragmatic value for specific missions, leading to inefficient bandwidth usage and irrelevant message transmission.

Innovation Solution

A communication system with a perception engine for encoding data, a cognition engine for selecting scene descriptions, and a decision engine for generating mission-relevant event descriptors, utilizing rate-distortion-power-delay optimization, rate-accuracy optimization, and rate-value optimization algorithms to prioritize mission-critical information transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If all scene descriptions are transmitted at cognition tier, then complete information is provided, but bandwidth is wasted due to transmission of irrelevant messages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and transmits only the most relevant scene descriptions at the cognition tier by filtering out irrelevant information. The system identifies and transmits only those scene descriptions that are most relevant to the recipient's mission, thereby reducing bandwidth consumption while maintaining information completeness for critical tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the transmission quality based on scene description relevance. High-quality detailed descriptions are transmitted for mission-critical events, while lower-quality or summarized descriptions are used for less critical events, optimizing the balance between information completeness and bandwidth efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If non-text signal communication is used at perception tier, then direct perception is enabled, but bandwidth and processing resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperception accuracyVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by allowing flexible switching between perception tier (raw signals) and cognition tier (processed descriptions) based on real-time conditions. The system dynamically adjusts the communication tier depending on mission requirements, network conditions, and processing capabilities, optimizing the balance between perception accuracy and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If existing signal quality measures are used, then technical quality can be measured, but pragmatic value for specific missions cannot be quantified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal quality measurementVSAvoidmission-specific relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameters from traditional signal quality metrics to mission-pragmatic value metrics. The system evaluates communication effectiveness based on whether transmitted information achieves mission objectives rather than solely based on signal fidelity, enabling quantification of pragmatic value for specific missions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If independent study of non-text signal and semantic communication is pursued, then specialized optimization is achieved, but synergistic benefits are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges non-text signal communication and semantic communication into a unified framework that operates across perception, cognition, and decision tiers. The system combines the advantages of both approaches, enabling synergistic benefits by integrating raw signal processing with semantic understanding and mission-relevant information extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260017463A1System for facilitating communication between ai agents
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
  • US20260017463A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017463A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017463A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a system for facilitating communication between AI agents by processing and interpreting real-time scene data in response to mission-related requests. The system includes sensory devices within an AI agent to collect environmental data and a large language model module to construct a mission-specific event dictionary. A perception engine processes the collected data, while a cognition engine extracts semantic information. A decision engine identifies mission-relevant events using the event dictionary. An integrated operating platform, comprising processors and memory, supports a multi-tiered communication framework: at the perception tier, encoded data is transmitted; at the cognition tier, selected scene descriptions are shared; and at the decision tier, mission-relevant event descriptors are communicated. This architecture ensures context-aware, tier-specific information exchange tailored to the recipient AI agent's mission needs.