AI-Agent Software Development With Secure Command Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software development processes are lengthy and require manual intervention for each step, leading to inefficiencies and high computational resource usage.

Innovation Solution

An AI-driven software development system that autonomously performs software engineering tasks using AI-agents interacting with generative neural models to determine commands, executed within a secure environment, and managed by a conversation manager to ensure efficient task completion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual intervention is used for each software development step, then developer control and analysis capability are maintained, but development time and computational resource usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware development efficiencyVSAvoiddevelopment cycle duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The AI agent performs software development tasks autonomously by analyzing codebases, generating code, writing tests, and executing them without requiring continuous manual intervention. The system self-manages the development process from planning to deployment, transforming developers from manual operators to system orchestrators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with AI-driven automated systems. The AI agent substitutes human cognitive and manual labor in analyzing code, generating software components, and executing development tasks, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual process while maintaining development quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated AI agents are used to perform software engineering tasks, then development speed and resource efficiency improve, but system complexity and security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI agent divides complex software development tasks into smaller, manageable sub-tasks such as code analysis, code generation, test writing, and execution. Each sub-task is handled by specialized modules within the AI agent, making the overall complex system manageable through functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a sandboxed execution environment as an intermediary between the AI agent and the actual code execution. This intermediary layer isolates potential security risks while allowing automated task execution, thereby managing system complexity through a controlled intermediate layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If AI agents execute commands on user codebases, then automation level increases, but security risks and privacy concerns worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous task executionVSAvoidsecurity risks to user codebase
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a sandboxed execution environment that prepares protective measures in advance before AI agents execute commands on user codebases. This sandbox acts as a protective cushion that prevents malicious operations while allowing legitimate automated tasks to execute, thereby cushioning against security risks before they can materialize.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The sandboxed execution environment serves as an intermediary layer between the AI agent's automated commands and the user's actual codebase. This intermediary protects the user codebase from potential harmful operations while still enabling the AI agent to perform authorized development tasks, thus mediating between automation and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250291583A1Automated ai-driven software development
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20250291583A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291583A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291583A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated AI-driven software development system utilizes generative neural models to determine the commands needed to execute a software engineering task. The system uses a conversation manager that manages conversations between an AI-autonomous environment and a codebase environment to determine the operations needed to complete a software engineering task until all operations complete. The AI-autonomous environment utilizes the AI-agents coupled to the generative neural models to determine the commands needed to achieve a user task and any follow-on tasks needed to ensure that the user task works as intended. The codebase environment performs the operations needed for the user task in a secure execution environment with access to the user's codebase.