AI Algorithm Selection for Medical Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) algorithms in oncology face challenges in integration with clinical workflows and lack a physician- and patient-centered approach, leading to suboptimal adoption and mistrust in AI solutions for tasks like tumor segmentation and vascular involvement assessment.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for processing medical image data that integrates patient data, image data, and AI algorithms to determine relevant anatomical objects and select appropriate algorithms for specific clinical questions, providing visual guidance and metrics for improved decision-making in oncological interventions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If AI algorithms are integrated into clinical workflows, then cancer detection accuracy and diagnostic efficiency are improved, but algorithm selection complexity and system integration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancer detection accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the AI algorithm selection process into distinct modules: use case identification module, anatomical object determination module, and algorithm selection module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the complex selection process independently, making the overall system more manageable and easier to implement while maintaining high detection accuracy through specialized algorithm application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple AI algorithms are applied to different anatomical objects, then comprehensive clinical assessment is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive clinical assessmentVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-categorizing anatomical objects and pre-selecting appropriate algorithms based on use case scenarios. The anatomical object determination module identifies the relevant anatomical structures before algorithm execution, and the algorithm selection module retrieves pre-validated algorithms matching the anatomical category, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining comprehensive assessment coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If AI algorithms are made more specialized for specific anatomical objects, then diagnostic precision for specific structures is improved, but system versatility and adaptability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic precision for anatomical structuresVSAvoidsystem adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by creating a modular architecture where the same framework can handle multiple anatomical objects through a unified algorithm selection mechanism. The anatomical object determination module and algorithm selection module work together to adapt specialized algorithms to different anatomical contexts, allowing the system to maintain high diagnostic precision for specific structures while remaining versatile across various anatomical regions and disease types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250014690A1Processing image data for assessing a clinical question
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US20250014690A1 patent drawing
  • US20250014690A1 patent drawing
  • US20250014690A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system (100) for processing medical image data regarding a clinical question uses patient data (110), medical image data (120) and clinical guidelines (170). The system has a processor subsystem (160) to determine, based on user input (140), a use case regarding the clinical question for a patient. The processor retrieves the patient data and image data regarding the use case to determine an anatomical object. Then, the processor selects an algorithm from an algorithm repository (AM) based on the determined anatomical object and executes the algorithm on the image data to provide the output data for assessing the clinical question. The processor may also use the codified clinical guidelines regarding the use case to select said algorithm. Effectively the most appropriate algorithm is executed for the specific use case.