AI Anomaly Detection for Network Malware Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current malware detection systems face significant challenges in distinguishing between legitimate and malicious activities, often resulting in false positives due to variations in user behavior, leading to increased administration costs and complexity in setting detection rules.

Innovation Solution

An AI engine analyzes system configurations and behavior patterns to identify deviations from expected behavior, using machine learning techniques to classify activities as safe or malicious, thereby reducing false positives and improving detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If detection rules are made more sensitive to catch malicious activities, then malware detection accuracy is improved, but false positive rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for detection from static IOA rules to dynamic behavior patterns derived from machine learning models. By continuously learning from historical data and adapting to normal behavior variations, the system maintains high detection sensitivity while reducing false positives through statistically significant deviation detection rather than rigid rule matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated machine learning models that automatically learn and adapt to legitimate user behaviors without requiring manual rule configuration. The AI engine autonomously identifies patterns, updates behavior baselines, and detects anomalies, eliminating the need for administrators to manually tune detection rules and reducing false positives from over-sensitive static rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manually configured detection rules and exclusions are implemented to reduce false positives, then detection accuracy is improved, but administration costs and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem administration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual rule configuration and exclusion management with an AI-driven automated system. Machine learning models automatically learn legitimate behaviors and detect anomalies, substituting human administrative effort with autonomous algorithms that continuously adapt without requiring manual intervention or complex rule maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The AI engine provides self-service by automatically learning behavior patterns, updating detection baselines, and adapting to organizational changes without administrator intervention. The system autonomously manages its own configuration, eliminating the need for manual rule updates and exclusion management that previously increased administrative complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If traditional IOA-based detection methods are used, then malicious activities can be identified, but massive false positives occur due to routine tasks varying by user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalicious activity identificationVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by creating user-specific and context-specific behavior patterns instead of universal IOA rules. Each user and system configuration receives customized behavior baselines that account for their specific routine tasks and work patterns, allowing the system to accurately identify malicious activities while recognizing legitimate user-specific behaviors as normal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11936513B2System and method for anomaly detection in a computer network
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 ACRONIS INT
  • US11936513B2 patent drawing
  • US11936513B2 patent drawing
  • US11936513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An anomaly detection system uses an AI engine to analyze configurations and backups to identify and assess anomalies. Backup data and configurations are used to characterize events as either secure or insecure.