AI Anomaly Detection in DUT Behavior During EMS Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for detecting anomalies in a device under test during electromagnetic susceptibility measurements require manual definition of regions of interest, which is subjective and limited to known errors, failing to detect unknown anomalies effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus utilizing an artificial intelligence algorithm to automatically detect anomalies by monitoring a device under test in a controlled environment, generating observation data with and without disturbances, and processing these data to identify anomalies using trained AI models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual user-defined regions of interest are used to detect anomalies, then the detection process is simple and straightforward, but the detection is subjective and limited to known errors only

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of detection processVSAvoiddetection capability for unknown anomalies
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of the device under test to generate baseline observation data before actual testing. This baseline data is used to train the AI algorithm, enabling it to learn normal operational patterns and detect deviations automatically during subsequent tests without requiring manual definition of regions of interest

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of defining regions of interest with an AI-based automated system. The AI algorithm automatically identifies anomalies by comparing observed data against learned patterns, eliminating the need for subjective human input and enabling detection of previously unknown error types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If manual definition of regions of interest is required, then the system structure remains simple, but automation level is reduced and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidautomated anomaly detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the device under test to monitor itself through integrated sensors and the AI algorithm automatically analyzes the collected data. The AI learns from baseline data generated during normal operation and autonomously identifies anomalies without requiring external manual intervention or complex system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the detection approach by changing from fixed manual parameters (regions of interest) to dynamic AI-learned parameters. The system collects multiple types of operational data and uses the AI algorithm to automatically determine which parameters indicate anomalies, adapting to different device types and failure modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional testing methods are used, then the testing process is straightforward, but only known types of errors can be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting processVSAvoidcompleteness of anomaly detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring to generate baseline observation data that captures normal operational patterns. This baseline is used to train the AI algorithm before actual testing, enabling the system to detect both known and unknown anomalies by comparing test data against the learned baseline without complicating the testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The AI-based detection system is designed to be universal and applicable to multiple device types and failure modes. By training the AI on diverse baseline data and using pattern recognition rather than device-specific rules, the system can detect various types of anomalies across different devices while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4439094B1Method and apparatus for detecting anomalies in an operation behavior of a device under test
Publication Date: 2026.05.06 ROHDE & SCHWARZ GMBH & CO KG
  • EP4439094B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4439094B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4439094B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for detecting anomalies in an operation behavior of a device under test (DUT), in particular during electromagnetic susceptibility (EMS) measurements. The apparatus comprises a monitoring unit adapted to generate a first set of observation data of the operation behavior of a DUT while the DUT is not subjected to disturbances and adapted to generate a second set of observation data of the operation behavior of a DUT while the DUT is subjected to disturbances and comprising an AI module trained with the first set of observation data generated by the monitoring unit and adapted to process the second set of observation data to detect anomalies in the operation behavior of the DUT while being subjected to the disturbances and comprising a reporting unit adapted to reporting anomalies in the operation behavior of the DUT detected by the trained AI module.