AI Assembly Optimization for Component Replacement and Modularization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current assembly design optimization methods face challenges of low efficiency and high resource usage, particularly in value engineering and component engineering.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning models for end-to-end analysis and optimization of assemblies, identifying components with issues and generating optimization data for replacement recommendations, functional block standardization, and component modularization to improve design efficiency and reduce resource consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional assembly design optimization methods are used, then design processes can be completed, but efficiency is low and resource usage is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign efficiencyVSAvoidresource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/manual design optimization processes with an AI-based machine learning system. The machine learning model automatically analyzes assembly data, identifies optimization opportunities, and generates replacement recommendations, substituting human manual analysis and mechanical review processes with intelligent automated systems that consume fewer resources and operate more efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model enables the design optimization system to perform self-analysis and self-optimization. The system automatically processes assembly data, identifies components for replacement, evaluates candidate components, and generates optimization recommendations without requiring extensive manual intervention, thereby improving productivity while reducing resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive component analysis is performed to identify issues and generate replacement recommendations, then optimization quality improves, but computational resources and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization qualityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model is pre-trained on extensive assembly data and component information before deployment. This preliminary training enables the model to quickly analyze new assemblies and generate accurate replacement recommendations without requiring time-consuming computational processes during actual optimization tasks, thus maintaining high optimization quality while reducing analysis time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the optimization process into distinct phases: identifying target assemblies, analyzing specific components with issues, generating candidate replacements, and evaluating optimization opportunities. The machine learning model processes each segment efficiently, focusing computational resources on critical analysis tasks rather than performing exhaustive comprehensive analysis, thereby improving optimization quality while reducing overall analysis time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260044662A1Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products for intelligent design optimization
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20260044662A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044662A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044662A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to intelligent assembly analysis and optimization. A target assembly may be identified. One or more optimization operations may be performed on the target assembly to generate optimization data for the target assembly.