AI-Driven Atomic Manipulation for Automated Defect-Avoiding Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current atomic-scale manipulation techniques are time-consuming, require constant operator input, and are not scalable for high-throughput production due to the need for manual classification of atoms/molecules and defects, leading to probe damage and recalibration.

Innovation Solution

Employing machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques to automate the classification and manipulation of atoms/molecules using scanning tunneling microscopy, allowing for automated fabrication of arbitrary atomic-scale structures without operator intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual operator control is used for atomic manipulation, then precise atomic-scale fabrication can be achieved, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and requires constant operator input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatomic-scale fabrication precisionVSAvoidfabrication throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated atomic manipulation where the SPM system itself performs classification of atoms and defects, path planning, and manipulation execution without continuous human intervention. The automation loop independently identifies targets, plans trajectories, executes movements, and recalibrates, transforming the manual process into a self-service automated fabrication system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual operation of the SPM system with an automated control system that uses imaging data processing, classification algorithms, and robotic control to perform atomic manipulation. The human operator's manual control is substituted by an automated feedback loop that processes images, identifies features, and executes manipulation sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If operator manually identifies and moves each atom, then arbitrary atomic structures can be fabricated, but the time required prevents widespread adoption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearbitrary structure fabrication capabilityVSAvoidfabrication time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of atoms and defects by processing imaging data to identify movable atoms, fixed atoms, and defect locations before manipulation begins. This preliminary identification and classification enables the system to plan efficient manipulation sequences in advance, reducing the time required during actual fabrication by avoiding real-time decision-making delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system maintains continuous operation by eliminating idle time between manipulation steps. The control system continuously processes imaging data, updates classification, plans trajectories, and executes movements in an uninterrupted automated loop, maximizing the useful action time and eliminating the pauses inherent in manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If SPM tip is brought close to surface for atomic manipulation, then precise control is achieved, but the tip is easily damaged by defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatomic position control precisionVSAvoidprobe tip durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification and classification of defects in the imaging data before manipulation begins. By预先 identifying defect locations and classifying them as fixed features to be avoided, the system can plan manipulation trajectories that steer clear of defects, preventing tip damage before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging system and classification algorithms serve as an intermediary between the operator and the SPM tip. This intermediary layer processes visual information to identify safe manipulation targets and generates trajectories that avoid defects, acting as a protective mediator that prevents the tip from encountering harmful features while maintaining precise control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If single operator uses single SPM for atomic manipulation, then precise fabrication is possible, but scalability for mass production is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatomic manipulation precisionVSAvoidmass production capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the single-operator manual system with an automated control system that can manage multiple SPM systems simultaneously. This substitution enables scaling from one operator controlling one SPM to one control system managing multiple SPMs, maintaining precision while increasing throughput through parallel operation of multiple manipulation stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control system is designed with universal functionality to manage multiple SPM systems and perform various manipulation tasks. This multi-functional system can control different SPMs for different structures or work on multiple structures simultaneously, enabling the system to scale from single-unit to multi-unit production while maintaining the same level of precision and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates mass-produced atomic-scale processing with reduced fabrication times by enabling automated classification and movement of atoms/molecules, avoiding defects and optimizing movement paths to prevent probe damage.

Implementation Method 1

The imaging sensor may include a scanning tunneling microscope that performs a scan of the surface to obtain the image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScanning tunneling microscopy: Scanning Probe Microscopy

Implementation Method 2

a scanning microscope having a scanning probe that provides electrostatic manipulation of positions of atoms on a surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic manipulation: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS12387313B2Artificial intelligence driven automated atomic manipulation
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 UCHICAGO ARGONNE LLC
  • US12387313B2 patent drawing
  • US12387313B2 patent drawing
  • US12387313B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Typical atomic manipulation techniques require long fabrication times and are not readily scalable due to necessary input from an operator. A method and system for performing automated atomic manipulation is described. The method includes obtaining an image of an atomic manipulation surface for fabricating an atomic structure thereon. A processor performs image processing and determines a movable elements, and defects, in the image of the atomic manipulation surface. The processor further determines respective positions of each of the movable elements, and forbidden regions of the atomic manipulation surface, each forbidden region determined from the determined defects. A fabrication design plan is then determined from the positions of the movable elements, and forbidden regions.