Anti-Hallucination Module for Generative AI Attribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional generative artificial intelligence systems suffer from hallucination, where they generate biased or faulty information due to statistical inaccuracy and data bias, and lack mechanisms for users to verify or corroborate the accuracy of the content, especially in enterprise environments with incomplete and disparate information.

Innovation Solution

An anti-hallucination and attribution architecture is introduced that detects, prevents, and mitigates hallucination by parsing and attributing responses, providing traceable attribution to confirm the reliability of the answers through an anti-hallucination and attribution module, which can be integrated with existing generative AI systems without retooling, and supports various input formats like text, audio, and images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional generative AI models are used to generate content, then creativity and information synthesis are improved, but hallucination and factual accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent generation capabilityVSAvoidfactual accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification system that sits between the generative AI model and the user. This system includes a fact-checking module that cross-references generated content against trusted knowledge bases, and an attribution module that sources information from reliable external sources. The intermediary acts as a mediator that preserves the creative output of the generative model while filtering and verifying the factual accuracy before presentation to the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors generated content for potential hallucinations and corrects them in real-time. The verification module provides feedback to the generative model about accuracy issues, enabling the system to learn from errors and improve factual accuracy while maintaining content generation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If generative AI systems operate without verification mechanisms, then response speed and automation are improved, but trustworthiness and verifiability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidtrustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing verification and fact-checking operations in advance before content is fully generated or presented to the user. The system pre-loads trusted knowledge bases, pre-validates sources, and pre-checks factual accuracy of generated content. This allows the system to maintain fast response times while ensuring trustworthiness, as the verification work is done proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If anti-hallucination verification mechanisms are added to generative AI systems, then factual accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefactual accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the verification system into distinct modular components: a fact-checking module, an attribution module, a knowledge base module, and a verification orchestrator. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently configured and maintained. This segmentation reduces system complexity by making the verification architecture manageable, scalable, and easier to integrate with existing generative AI systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive source attribution is implemented, then verifiability and accountability are improved, but information processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribution accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing selective attribution rather than comprehensive attribution for all generated content. The system prioritizes attribution for factual claims, statistical data, and contentious statements while using simplified or omitted attribution for creative expressions, opinions, and well-established facts. This approach maintains verification accuracy for critical information while reducing overall processing time and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240370709A1Enterprise generative artificial intelligence Anti-hallucination and attribution architecture
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 C3 AI INC
  • US20240370709A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370709A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370709A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An anti-hallucination and attribution architecture for enterprise generative AI systems is disclosed herein which increases the accuracy and reliability of generative artificial intelligence content (e.g., responses or answers) by detecting, preventing, and mitigating hallucination. The anti-hallucination and attribution architecture can be added to deployed generative artificial intelligence systems as a separate tool or module, which allows it to work with the deployed systems without having to retool or redesign those systems. The anti-hallucination and attribution architecture can also be deployed with minimal impact on live production systems.