AI Beam Management for Wireless UE Power and Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems lack efficient methods for beam management, leading to high power consumption, increased latency, and reduced signal quality due to the need for extensive beam sweeping and refinement processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of AI-enabled beam management techniques, where user equipment (UE) utilizes AI algorithms to process beam measurements and infer higher strength and quality beams, reducing the need for extensive beam sweeping and refinement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If extensive beam sweeping and refinement processes are performed to achieve high directional precision and signal quality, then beam measurement accuracy is improved, but power consumption increases and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam measurement accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary beam sweeping to identify candidate beams, then uses AI algorithms to predict and infer optimal beams without exhaustive measurement. This preliminary action reduces the need for extensive subsequent beam refinement, thereby lowering power consumption while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

AI algorithms are introduced as an intermediary between beam sweeping and beam selection. The AI model processes beam measurement data and predicts optimal beams, acting as a mediator that reduces the computational burden and power consumption associated with traditional exhaustive beam refinement processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If extensive beam sweeping and refinement processes are performed to achieve high directional precision and signal quality, then beam measurement accuracy is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam measurement accuracyVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary beam sweeping to identify candidate beams, then uses AI algorithms to predict and infer optimal beams without exhaustive measurement. This preliminary action reduces the time required for subsequent beam refinement, thereby reducing latency while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical beam sweeping and refinement processes are replaced with AI-based prediction algorithms. This substitution eliminates the time-consuming iterative measurement and adjustment processes, significantly reducing latency while maintaining or improving beam selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Use of energy by moving object

If AI algorithms are used to infer beams from measured beams, then power consumption is reduced and latency is reduced, but beam measurement accuracy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidbeam measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial beam sweeping to gather sufficient training data for AI algorithms, then uses these algorithms to infer optimal beams. This partial action approach consumes less power and time while the AI model compensates for the reduced measurement coverage, maintaining accuracy through intelligent prediction rather than exhaustive measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The AI algorithms create virtual copies or predictions of beam characteristics based on measured data patterns. Instead of performing exhaustive physical measurements, the system uses AI-generated virtual beam profiles to identify optimal beams, reducing power consumption while maintaining measurement accuracy through pattern recognition and prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12335018B2Artificial intelligence enabled beam management
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US12335018B2 patent drawing
  • US12335018B2 patent drawing
  • US12335018B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure relate to artificial intelligence (AI) enabled beam management. A base station may notify a user equipment (UE) of an availability of AI-enabled beam management and provide configuration parameters for an AI algorithm. The UE may utilize the configuration parameters to configure an AI algorithm. The UE may process a first set of beams utilizing the configured AI algorithm to identify a second set of beams. The UE may notify the base station (and/or other network entity) of the second set of beams, and one or more beams of the second set of beams can be utilized for wireless communication between the UE and the base station and/or other network entity or UE.