AI Design Tool for Bias Detection and Inclusive Training Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AI systems suffer from biases due to limited and biased training datasets, leading to inadequate performance in diverse real-world scenarios and lack of transparency in data usage, resulting in unnoticed algorithmic injustices.

Innovation Solution

An AI design tool that allows users to select algorithms, process input data, identify and remove biases, and incorporate supplementary data to create inclusive AI systems, providing transparency and cultural considerations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional AI systems are trained on limited datasets, then the training process is simpler and faster, but the systems suffer from biases and cannot adequately scale to diverse audiences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically identifying and acquiring supplementary training data before the main training process. The AI design tool proactively searches for, retrieves, and integrates additional diverse training data from external sources, ensuring the system is prepared to handle diverse scenarios before deployment rather than reacting to biases after they manifest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The AI design tool acts as an intermediary between the limited initial dataset and the final comprehensive training system. It mediates by automatically identifying gaps in the training data, acquiring supplementary data from external sources, and integrating this additional data to create a more balanced and representative training corpus without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional AI systems use existing western diagnostics and frameworks, then the model development is easier, but the models incorporate unnoticed algorithmic injustices and biases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel development easeVSAvoidalgorithmic injustices
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor and evaluate the AI model for biases and algorithmic injustices. The AI design tool analyzes the trained model's performance across different demographic groups and scenarios, providing feedback that identifies unfair patterns. This feedback loop enables the system to detect and correct biases that would otherwise remain unnoticed in models built using conventional frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by proactively identifying and counteracting biases before they become entrenched in the model. The AI design tool预先 analyzes training data for representational gaps and fairness issues, and adjusts the training process to prevent algorithmic injustices from developing, rather than merely detecting them after model deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Productivity

If conventional AI systems deploy without data discussion, then the deployment process is faster, but the biases in training data remain unidentified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidbias detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing bias detection and data analysis functions that would otherwise require manual human review. The AI design tool autonomously analyzes training datasets for biases, identifies representational gaps, and generates fairness reports without requiring developers to manually examine the data, thus maintaining rapid deployment while ensuring bias detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If users want to create systems with wider training data, then the system inclusivity improves, but conventional users lack the ability and resources to identify and use appropriate training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem inclusivityVSAvoiddata selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system empowers conventional users through self-service automation. The AI design tool automatically identifies appropriate supplementary training data sources, retrieves relevant data, and integrates it into the training corpus without requiring users to manually search or evaluate data sources. This eliminates the complexity of data selection while achieving improved system inclusivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The AI design tool serves as an intermediary between users with limited data selection capabilities and the vast landscape of available training data. It mediates by automatically identifying suitable data sources, filtering relevant information, and integrating appropriate datasets, thus enabling users to achieve comprehensive and inclusive training data without needing expertise in data selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12608519B2Tool for designing artificial intelligence systems
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 MEINDERS CHRISTINE
  • US12608519B2 patent drawing
  • US12608519B2 patent drawing
  • US12608519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed towards artificial intelligence systems and methods for receiving and analyzing data. An exemplary method provides for receiving input, at an interface on a computing device. The input includes a dataset, an analysis for the dataset, and an output medium. The method then provides for selecting, based on the received input, at least one algorithm from a plurality of algorithms. The method then provides for processing, via the computing device, the received input with the at least one algorithm to yield an output. The output is provided at the interface on the computing device.