Brush Quality Testing with AI Defect Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing brush manufacturing processes face challenges in reliable and economical quality testing, particularly in detecting defects in brush patterns, which are influenced by varying production conditions and machine types.

Innovation Solution

An AI-based classifier, trained with a dataset of defective brush images, is used to identify defects in brushes, enhanced by feedback training and adjustable manufacturing settings to generate targeted defect images, integrated with a testing device and manufacturing network for continuous improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional quality testing methods are used, then the testing process is simple, but the measurement precision and reliability of defect detection are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/optical inspection systems with an AI-based classification system that uses image processing and machine learning algorithms to detect defects. The classifier is trained with defect images and automatically identifies defects in brush patterns, substituting complex mechanical testing equipment with software-based intelligence that achieves higher precision without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the testing device by adjusting manufacturing settings to generate targeted defect images for training the AI classifier. By varying parameters such as bristle density, brush pattern geometry, and defect characteristics, the system creates a comprehensive training dataset that enables the classifier to accurately detect multiple defect types across different production conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the testing device is adapted to different brush patterns and machine types, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrush pattern compatibilityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI-based classifier is designed as a universal testing solution that can detect defects across multiple brush patterns, machine types, and production conditions. The single classifier system processes images from various brush configurations without requiring separate dedicated systems for each brush type, achieving multi-functionality through software-based pattern recognition rather than hardware reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts to different brush patterns and machine types by using a flexible image processing pipeline that adjusts processing parameters based on the input image characteristics. The classifier can be retrained with new defect images from different production conditions, allowing the system to dynamically adapt its detection capabilities without physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If comprehensive quality testing is performed on all brushes, then the reliability of quality control improves, but the productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control reliabilityVSAvoidbrush production speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces slow, manual, or step-by-step mechanical inspection methods with an AI-based image classification system that processes brush images rapidly. The classifier analyzes multiple defect types simultaneously in parallel computation, achieving comprehensive quality testing at speeds that match or exceed production rates, thereby maintaining productivity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by capturing images of brushes during or immediately after the manufacturing process, before brushes move to subsequent production stages. This early detection allows for immediate identification of defective brushes, preventing further processing of defective products and enabling real-time quality control that maintains production flow and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4085794B2Method for testing the quality of brushes, in particular toothbrushes, testing device and brush making machine
Publication Date: 2025.10.22 ZAHORANSKY AG
  • EP4085794B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4085794B2 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP4085794B2 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

The invention relates to improvements in the field of brush manufacturing. Among other things, a method for quality control of brushes (2) is proposed, in which a trained, preferably AI-based, classifier (4) is used. After appropriate training with a training dataset showing images of defective brushes, the classifier (4) is configured to classify brushes (2) to be tested as defective based on images of the brushes (2) (Fig. 1).