AI Building Inspection Using Thermal, Visual, and Vibration Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current building and infrastructure inspections are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to inconsistencies due to manual processes, posing safety risks and challenges in managing large-scale projects with limited staff, and resulting in potential missed spots and varying inspection quality.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of AI-powered systems that utilize autonomous vehicles or robots equipped with visual, thermal cameras, and LASER sensors to collect and analyze data, including thermal images, vibration, and electromagnetic data, for automated defect identification and remaining life prediction, leveraging big data analytics and deep learning algorithms for enhanced accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection by human inspectors is used, then inspection quality and technical judgment can be applied, but inspection time and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection qualityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection processes with automated sensing systems including thermal cameras, visual cameras, vibration sensors, and electromagnetic sensors. These sensors automatically collect data from building components, eliminating the need for manual measurement while maintaining detection capability through electronic data acquisition and processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system performs self-assessment through automated data collection, processing, and analysis. The system independently identifies defects, assesses their severity, and generates inspection reports without requiring continuous human intervention, enabling the inspection process to serve itself through algorithmic evaluation of sensor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If more human inspectors are deployed to manage large-scale projects, then inspection coverage improves, but labor costs and management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverageVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated inspection system is designed to handle multiple inspection tasks across diverse building components using a single integrated platform. The same system can inspect structural elements, mechanical components, and electrical systems by switching between different sensor modes and analysis algorithms, eliminating the need for specialized inspection teams for each component type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts to different inspection scenarios by changing operational parameters such as sensor selection, data processing algorithms, and assessment criteria. This allows a single system to manage varying inspection requirements across large-scale projects without requiring additional specialized equipment or personnel for each project type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If spot checks are used to ensure quality, then resource consumption is reduced, but inspection quality and completeness suffer due to missing spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumptionVSAvoidinspection completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated inspection system continuously scans and collects data from all target areas without interruption or sampling gaps. Unlike spot checks that selectively examine certain locations, the system maintains continuous monitoring across the entire inspection area, ensuring no defects are missed while optimizing resource usage through automated data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual inspection processes are used, then flexibility in handling different inspection scenarios is maintained, but consistency and reliability of inspection results vary due to human competency differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection flexibilityVSAvoidinspection consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains flexibility by adjusting operational parameters such as sensor types, data processing algorithms, and assessment thresholds based on specific inspection requirements. At the same time, these parameter changes are systematically managed through pre-configured protocols and automated decision-making algorithms, ensuring consistent and reliable results across different inspection scenarios without human variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240210330A1Systems and methods for artificial intelligence powered inspections and predictive analyses
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 RASPECT INTELLIGENCE INSPECTION LTD
  • US20240210330A1 patent drawing
  • US20240210330A1 patent drawing
  • US20240210330A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system to identify potential building and infrastructure issues by using artificial intelligence powered assessment and predictive analysis. The system employs big data from autonomous vehicles or robots coupled with visual and thermal cameras for autonomous inspections. The system may further inspect the operation status of the machineries based on their vibrations.