AI Troubleshooting for Development Tool Change File Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Analyzing large sets of interrelated change files for design-time changes in software applications is time-consuming and error-prone, especially when troubleshooting runtime issues, due to complex dependencies and relationships between these files.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an AI-assisted troubleshooting system that uses a machine learning model to process and analyze delta objects stored in change files, integrating natural language processing to provide efficient and automated insights into design-time changes, while ensuring data privacy through de-identification techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review of change files is performed to troubleshoot issues, then detection accuracy can be maintained, but time consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

An AI assistant acts as an intermediary between the change files and the user, automatically analyzing the complex set of change files and dependencies to identify the root cause of runtime errors. The AI processes the change files, user queries, and dependency relationships to generate troubleshooting insights, thereby maintaining high detection accuracy while significantly reducing the time required compared to manual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If all change files are analyzed to ensure complete troubleshooting coverage, then detection accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI assistant segments the analysis process by first understanding the user's query about a specific runtime error, then selectively analyzing only the relevant change files and dependencies related to that error. Rather than processing all change files uniformly, the AI divides the task into focused analysis steps based on the user's specific troubleshooting needs, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage of relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The AI applies different analysis depths to different parts of the change file set based on their relevance to the user's query. Highly relevant change files receive detailed analysis, while less relevant files receive minimal or no analysis. This local quality approach ensures that detection accuracy is maintained for critical files while reducing the overall computational complexity of the troubleshooting system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If automated AI processing is implemented to reduce manual analysis time, then productivity increases, but measurement precision may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetroubleshooting efficiencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The AI assistant implements feedback mechanisms by continuously refining its analysis based on user queries and interactions. The system processes user feedback about the accuracy and relevance of its troubleshooting insights, adjusting its analysis approach accordingly. This feedback loop enables the AI to maintain high detection accuracy while operating at automated speeds, bridging the gap between productivity gains and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12619517B2Artificial intelligence-assisted troubleshooting for application development tools
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 SAP SE
  • US12619517B2 patent drawing
  • US12619517B2 patent drawing
  • US12619517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods described herein relate to automated troubleshooting for application development tools. First data comprise a plurality of delta objects and a user query. The plurality of delta objects identify design-time changes made to an application using a development tool. The user query is received via a user interface and relates to at least one of the design-time changes. The first data is preprocessed to obtain second data. The preprocessing of the first data includes modifying a subset of the first data and adding one or more predetermined instructions to the first data. The second data is provided to a machine learning model to obtain a response to the user query. Output indicative of the response is caused to be presented in the user interface.