AI Client Support for Real-Time Application Error Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in completing complex software service applications due to errors from inaccurate or missing information, technical issues, and network connectivity problems, leading to repetitive and resource-intensive application attempts.

Innovation Solution

A computing system uses artificial intelligence, including machine learning models, to detect and predict errors in real-time by monitoring text input and contextual information, generating recommendations to resolve errors, such as prompting users for corrections or technical adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users complete complex software service applications manually, then applications can be submitted for service access, but errors from inaccurate information and technical issues cause repetitive retries consuming time and resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication submission success rateVSAvoidtime for application completion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by monitoring user input during application completion and providing immediate error detection and corrective suggestions. This feedback mechanism identifies potential errors before submission, preventing failed retries and reducing completion time while improving success rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary error detection and validation during the application filling process rather than waiting for submission. By proactively identifying and flagging potential errors before the application is submitted, the system prevents failed retries and reduces the overall time required for successful application completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If users complete complex software service applications manually, then applications can be submitted for service access, but technical issues and network connectivity problems lead to processing failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication processing reliabilityVSAvoidapplication processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary error detection and monitoring component that sits between the user input and the application submission process. This intermediary layer captures contextual information, monitors for errors in real-time, and provides corrective guidance, thereby improving processing reliability without significantly increasing the perceived complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service error detection and correction by automatically monitoring user input, identifying potential errors, and providing contextual suggestions for resolution. This automated self-correction mechanism reduces reliance on complex manual validation systems while improving application processing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If real-time error detection and monitoring is implemented, then unnecessary application retries are reduced, but computing resources are consumed for monitoring and analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication completion efficiencyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial monitoring by focusing computational resources on detecting specific high-impact errors in user input rather than analyzing every aspect of the application process. This selective error detection approach maintains high productivity by preventing costly retries while consuming fewer computing resources compared to comprehensive continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250377976A1Providing client support for applications to software services
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 TRUIST BANK
  • US20250377976A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377976A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377976A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Client support for applications to access services can be provided. In an example, a computing system can receive, from a client device, text input for an in-progress application to access a service. The client may be prevented from accessing the service prior to the in-progress application being approved. The computing system can detect an error associated with processing the in-progress application based on the text input and contextual information. the computing system can determine that the error is associated with the text input or with a technical issue associated with the in-progress application. The computing system can generate a recommendation associated with the error based on determining that the error is associated with the text input or the technical issue. The computing system may output the recommendation to the client device for use in resolving the error with processing the in-progress application.