AI-Assisted User Code Modification Through Simulation-Based Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data scientists, software engineers, and infrastructure administrators face challenges in identifying necessary hardware resources for code implementation in data centers, leading to bottlenecks and low-quality, resource-intensive code deployments.

Innovation Solution

An automated user code modification system using artificial intelligence techniques processes user-provided code to generate optimized code segments, executes them in a simulation environment, and provides recommendations for resource allocation based on performance metrics and user preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional approaches are used for code deployment, then human collaboration is maintained, but performance tuning capabilities are limited and code quality is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode deployment qualityVSAvoidmanual collaboration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the code optimization system to automatically analyze, optimize, and deploy code without requiring manual intervention from data scientists, software engineers, or infrastructure administrators. The automated system performs performance tuning and resource allocation independently, transforming a manual collaborative process into an autonomous self-service operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human collaboration and manual code optimization with an automated computational system. Instead of relying on human experts to manually tune code and allocate resources, the system uses algorithms and machine learning models to automatically perform these tasks, substituting human mechanical processes with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If manual code optimization is performed, then human expertise is utilized, but bottlenecks occur and resource efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-analyzing code patterns, pre-identifying optimization opportunities, and pre-allocating resources before actual code execution. The automated system prepares optimization strategies in advance based on code analysis, allowing for faster deployment without sacrificing optimization quality. This preliminary preparation eliminates bottlenecks that occur during manual optimization processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuity of useful action by establishing an automated feedback loop where code is continuously analyzed, optimized, and re-deployed without manual intervention. The system maintains continuous operation, constantly improving code performance and resource allocation rather than performing discrete manual optimization cycles. This continuous automated process eliminates the time loss associated with repeated manual optimization iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If automated code optimization is implemented, then productivity increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode deployment speedVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a multi-functional automated platform that performs code analysis, optimization, resource allocation, and deployment monitoring within a single integrated system. Rather than requiring separate complex systems for each function, the universal platform handles multiple tasks simultaneously, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity. The same automated system serves multiple purposes across different code deployment scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12430102B2Automatically modifying user code using artificial intelligence techniques
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 DELL PROD LP
  • US12430102B2 patent drawing
  • US12430102B2 patent drawing
  • US12430102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, and processor-readable storage media for automatically modifying user code using artificial intelligence techniques are provided herein. An example computer-implemented method includes obtaining user-provided code and one or more items of information associated with the user-provided code; determining code functionality information and one or more execution-related details associated with the user-provided code by processing at least a portion of the user-provided code and at least a portion of the items of information using artificial intelligence techniques; generating one or more code segments, related to one or more portions of the user-provided code, by processing the code functionality information and the execution-related detail(s) using the artificial intelligence techniques; executing at least a portion of the code segment(s) in at least one simulation environment; and performing one or more automated actions based on results from executing the at least a portion of the code segment(s).