AI Code Segment Replacement for Software Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developers often select code segments that are not well-suited to their applications due to a lack of knowledge about functionally equivalent alternatives, leading to inefficiencies in factors like speed, security, and compatibility.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a trained knowledge manager to identify and replace code segments with comparable alternatives based on metadata analysis, utilizing a deep learning architecture and reinforcement learning to generate syntactically correct code snippets that meet specific requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If developers manually select code segments based on their knowledge, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but code suitability and performance are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode suitabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an AI-based code recommendation system as an intermediary between the developer and the code segment selection process. This system analyzes functional requirements, compares multiple code segment options, and recommends the most suitable code segments, thereby improving code suitability without requiring the developer to have extensive knowledge of all available options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of code segment selection with an automated AI-based system. The system uses machine learning models to evaluate code segments based on functional requirements, security considerations, and performance metrics, automatically identifying the most appropriate code segments without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If developers use code segments they are familiar with, then ease of operation is maintained, but performance optimization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware performanceVSAvoiddeveloper effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service code recommendation system that automatically analyzes functional requirements and identifies optimal code segments without requiring developers to manually search or evaluate options. The system serves itself by learning from feedback and continuously improving its recommendations, thereby enhancing software performance while minimizing additional developer effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system learns from developer selections and software performance outcomes. This feedback loop enables the AI model to continuously improve its code segment recommendations, ensuring that the suggested code segments not only meet functional requirements but also deliver optimal performance in real-world scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If comprehensive code analysis is performed to select best-suited segments, then code quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode qualityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of code segments during the development phase, before actual software deployment. The AI system pre-evaluates multiple code segment options based on functional requirements, security considerations, and performance metrics, and caches the results for quick retrieval. This preliminary action ensures that when code segments need to be selected or modified, the analysis has already been completed, minimizing additional processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a tiered analysis approach where the AI system performs comprehensive analysis only when necessary, and uses simplified evaluation for routine selections. The system can perform partial analysis on critical code segments while using heuristic-based evaluation for less critical portions, thereby maintaining high code quality without requiring exhaustive analysis in all cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11656855B2Identify, suggest, and auto-implement best practices for requirement specific software development
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11656855B2 patent drawing
  • US11656855B2 patent drawing
  • US11656855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is disclosed that receives a code segment from a source code file. The received code segment is inputted to a trained knowledge manager from which one or more comparable code segments are received. Each of the comparable code segments are identified as having similar functionality as the selected code segment and each of the comparable code segments has a set of metadata. The metadata is used to select one of the comparable code segments and this selected code segment is used to replace the original code segment in the source code file.