AI Collision Reconstruction for Faster Vehicle Claim Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing SaaS providers face inefficiencies in claim processing, particularly in insurance claims, due to time-consuming manual procedures and suboptimal communication with policy holders, leading to frustration and delays.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that utilizes artificial intelligence and machine learning to optimize claim processes, including guided content capture, dynamic scripting, and adaptive communication strategies to streamline information gathering, automate negotiations, and provide efficient claim handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual procedures are used for claim processing, then detailed human review and judgment can be performed, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim review accuracyVSAvoidclaim processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with an automated computing system that uses machine learning models and algorithms to analyze claim data, process images, and determine claim outcomes. This substitution eliminates human manual intervention while maintaining or improving review accuracy through consistent application of trained models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service claim processing where the computing system automatically gathers claim information, processes submitted data and images, applies decision rules, and generates claims determinations without requiring human reviewers. The system serves itself by autonomously completing the entire claims processing workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If traditional communication methods are used with policy holders, then simple interactions are possible, but user engagement and satisfaction decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication simplicityVSAvoiduser engagement quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The communication system dynamically adapts its behavior based on user responses, claim status, and interaction history. The computing system adjusts communication timing, channels, and content to optimize user engagement while maintaining simplicity. Communication strategies evolve dynamically rather than following static traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user responses and interactions are continuously monitored and fed back into the communication strategy. This allows the system to learn from user behavior patterns and adjust future communications to improve engagement quality while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260050713A1Collision reconstruction engine
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 ASSURED INSURANCE TECH INC
  • US20260050713A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050713A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050713A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system can obtain an information corpus corresponding to a vehicle incident involving a vehicle over one or more sessions with a user. Based on the information corpus, the system can generate a vehicle incident simulation of the vehicle incident.