AI Consensus System for Legislative Priorities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Democratic representative forms of government face impediments such as lack of effective consensus building and agenda setting mechanisms, leading to partisan conflicts and legislative stalemates, which undermine the effective exercise of popular sovereignty by citizens.

Innovation Solution

A social network incorporating AI-based machine learning technology enables users to define, share, and build consensus on legislative priorities, form voting blocs and coalitions, and plan campaigns to elect lawmakers who represent the majority's agendas, using decision-assisting AI and machine learning to facilitate cross-partisan collaboration and fact-checking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional representative democracy is used, then citizens can elect lawmakers, but partisan conflicts and lack of consensus building mechanisms prevent effective exercise of popular sovereignty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of exercising popular sovereigntyVSAvoideffectiveness of legislative outcomes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an AI-based intermediary system that mediates between citizens and lawmakers. The AI system processes citizen preferences, generates legislative agendas, and facilitates consensus building, thereby enabling effective exercise of popular sovereignty while reducing partisan conflicts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where citizen preferences are captured, processed by AI, and translated into legislative agendas. The outcomes are then fed back to citizens for evaluation, creating a responsive system that aligns legislative outcomes with popular sovereignty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If AI-based machine learning technology is used for decision assisting, then consensus building and agenda setting improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsensus building efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI system performs self-service by automatically processing citizen preferences, generating agendas, and facilitating consensus building without requiring complex manual intervention. The system self-adjusts and learns from interactions, reducing the need for human oversight while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The AI system is designed with multi-functionality, handling preference capture, data processing, agenda generation, and consensus facilitation within a single integrated platform. This universal approach consolidates complexity into one system rather than requiring multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If voters can define and share legislative priorities, then representation of majority agendas improves, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepresentation of majority willVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual information processing with AI-based automated processing. The AI system efficiently captures, processes, and analyzes voter preferences and legislative priorities, handling large volumes of information without human intervention and reducing information processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of information processing by transforming raw voter preferences into structured legislative agendas through AI processing. This parameter transformation consolidates and organizes information, reducing the processing load while maintaining accurate representation of majority will.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11935141B2Decision assisting artificial intelligence system for voter electoral and legislative consensus building
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 BORDIER NANCY
  • US11935141B2 patent drawing
  • US11935141B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented system and methods for electoral and legislative consensus building via a social network provide decision support to assist network users define their legislative priorities and set common legislative agendas. Users include individuals intending to vote (“voters”), lawmakers, electoral candidates, political parties, and others. Decision-assisting Artificial Intelligence, machine learning technology, a corpus of data in the domain of elections and legislation, and database of user stories, generate legislative priorities for user fact-checking, evaluating, debating, and voting to include in common agendas. The network connects voters within and across election districts and national boundaries to build consensus around legislative agendas with cross national scope. The network assists voters form online voting blocs, political parties, and electoral coalitions to elect lawmakers to enact their agendas, by attracting electoral support from voters across partisan lines. Users can provide legislative mandates to lawmakers by conducting petition drives, referendums, initiatives, and informal recall votes.