AI Content Injection System Contextual Data Enrichment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Artificial intelligence-generated content often lacks depth, providing superficial information by using the same human-like phrases for varying events, failing to convey the impact or significance based on contextual factors such as location or population, despite containing the same facts.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes AI-generated content to identify relevant data stores associated with extracted facts, determines the effect of these facts, and selects appropriate terms to modify the content, thereby enhancing its informational value by conveying the significance of events differently based on contextual factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If AI-generated content uses standard human-like phrases for all events, then the content generation process is simple and efficient, but the content lacks depth and contextual significance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformational depthVSAvoidcontent processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content generation process into multiple stages: initial AI content generation, fact extraction, contextual data retrieval, and term injection. This segmentation allows each stage to focus on a specific task, improving overall information depth without overwhelming complexity at any single stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying facts within the AI-generated content and pre-retrieving contextual data from data stores before the final content assembly. This preliminary processing ensures that contextual information is ready when needed, enhancing content depth without adding complexity during the main generation flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If AI-generated content provides only basic factual information, then the content generation is fast and efficient, but the content fails to convey impact or significance based on contextual factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual significanceVSAvoidcontent processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by selectively enhancing specific portions of the content where contextual factors are most relevant. Instead of uniformly processing all content, it identifies key facts and injects contextual terms only where they add significant value, maintaining efficiency while improving contextual significance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between the basic AI-generated content and the final output. This intermediary layer extracts facts, retrieves contextual data, and selectively injects relevant terms, serving as a mediator that adds contextual significance without requiring complete reprocessing of the entire content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If the system injects contextual data into AI content, then the content becomes more informative and engaging, but the processing complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformational richnessVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-structuring the content analysis phase to identify extractable facts and pre-establishing connections to relevant data stores. This preliminary organization reduces the complexity of the subsequent term injection phase, as the system already knows what contextual data to retrieve and where to inject it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting the level of contextual enhancement based on content type, fact importance, and available computational resources. This parametric approach allows the system to optimize between informational richness and processing complexity dynamically, injecting more contextual terms when resources permit and fewer when efficiency is prioritized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10942971B2Inserting elements into artificial intelligence content
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 NEWSRX LLC
  • US10942971B2 patent drawing
  • US10942971B2 patent drawing
  • US10942971B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies are described herein for injecting elements into artificial intelligence content. According to some examples, content generated from an artificial intelligence source is received, facts are determined from the content, and terms are selected for use based on the facts. The terms are used to modify or are added to the content to generate modified artificial intelligence content.