AI Content Redaction for Real-Time Visual and Audio Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content filtering systems fail to effectively identify and block undesirable visual and audio content, particularly on websites marked as safe, due to a lack of technical capabilities to analyze such content in real-time without reference to context or category.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system using an artificial intelligence inspection engine trained with machine learning to analyze visual and audio content in real-time, determining its appropriateness based on user-defined restriction parameters, and redacting or censoring undesirable content before transmission to the user device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional content filtering systems are used, then websites can be blocked based on category or keywords, but visual and audio content cannot be effectively identified and blocked in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent filtering effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection engine is trained in advance with machine learning models and restriction parameters before deployment. Content is analyzed preemptively before being transmitted to the user device, allowing the system to block undesirable visual and audio content without requiring complex real-time processing during content delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An inspection engine is introduced as an intermediary component between the content source and the user device. This engine analyzes digital content including visual and audio elements against restriction parameters, enabling effective filtering without making the entire system overly complex. The intermediary handles the analytical complexity separately from the content delivery pathway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If content is analyzed without reference to context or category, then real-time analysis capability is achieved, but accuracy in identifying undesirable content decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time analysis speedVSAvoidcontent appropriateness determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for content analysis by incorporating multiple dimensions including context, category, and specific content characteristics into the inspection process. The inspection engine evaluates digital content against restriction parameters that consider both the type of content and its contextual appropriateness, enabling accurate real-time determination of whether content should be blocked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical filtering methods based on simple keyword matching are replaced with machine learning-based inspection engines. These engines use trained models to analyze visual and audio content, automatically determining appropriateness based on learned patterns and restriction parameters, thereby achieving both speed and accuracy without manual rule-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If comprehensive content analysis is performed, then undesirable content can be identified accurately, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent classification accuracyVSAvoidcontent transmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection engine performs comprehensive content analysis in advance, before content is transmitted to the user device. By analyzing digital content including visual and audio elements against restriction parameters beforehand, the system determines which content should be blocked, eliminating delays during actual content delivery while maintaining accurate classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12574599B2Method and system for redacting undesirable digital content
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 LIGHTHOUSE TECH LTD
  • US12574599B2 patent drawing
  • US12574599B2 patent drawing
  • US12574599B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for redacting digital content are disclosed. The system includes an identification server and an inspection engine. The server is configured to receive a content request originating from a user device and to identify a user account associated with the content request. The server is further configured to tag the content request with a restriction identifier which is indicative of a restriction level of a user of the user device. The engine is configured to analyse visual content forming part of digital content requested by way of the content request before the digital content is transmitted to the user device. A result of the analysis performed by the inspection engine is used to determine whether the visual content is undesirable based on the restriction parameter. If classified as undesirable, the digital content or part thereof is redacted or censored before transmission thereof to the user device.