AI Control Test Evaluation for Multi-Tenant Compliance Audits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in efficiently evaluating and ensuring compliance with service controls for data privacy and security, particularly in multi-tenant systems, where ensuring data security and adherence to organizational policies is critical but often manual and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a transformer-based neural network for evaluating service controls, which processes structured query inputs to determine compliance with organizational policies, and performs automated audits to identify and remediate compliance failures, simulating human auditor processes for efficient and accurate compliance assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual control evaluation methods are used, then flexibility and adaptability in assessing organizational policies are maintained, but productivity and efficiency of compliance assessment are significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance assessment efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary AI system that acts as a mediator between organizational policies and control evaluation. The system includes policy parsers that convert natural language policies into structured representations, control evaluators that assess controls against these policies, and evidence collectors that gather supporting documentation. This intermediary layer automates the complex matching and reasoning processes, significantly improving compliance assessment efficiency while managing system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated AI-based evaluation mechanisms. Instead of human reviewers manually examining controls and policies, the system uses trained models including transformer-based architectures for policy interpretation, graph neural networks for control relationship analysis, and automated reasoning engines for compliance determination. This substitution dramatically increases productivity while the modular design keeps system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive control tests are performed on all supporting information, then measurement precision and reliability of compliance evaluation are improved, but loss of time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by introducing relevance scoring mechanisms that evaluate supporting information on a scale rather than requiring binary pass/fail decisions for all controls. The system calculates relevance scores between controls and supporting information, allowing evaluators to focus detailed analysis on high-relevance pairs while applying automated assessment to lower-relevance items. This approach maintains measurement precision for critical controls while reducing overall evaluation time through selective deep analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the compliance evaluation process into multiple independent stages: initial relevance filtering, selective detailed analysis, and aggregate compliance determination. The system divides supporting information into categories and controls into groups, evaluating them in hierarchical passes. This segmentation allows the system to achieve comprehensive coverage without processing every control-information pair at full depth simultaneously, thereby reducing total evaluation time while maintaining precision through multi-stage verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated AI-based control evaluation is implemented, then productivity and consistency of compliance assessment are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring control relationships increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance assessment throughputVSAvoidcontrol relationship analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing a multi-functional AI system that handles diverse control types, policy formats, and evidence sources through a unified architecture. The policy parser can process various policy representations (natural language, structured formats, regulatory frameworks), the control evaluator can assess different control categories (technical, administrative, physical), and the evidence collector can gather multiple evidence types (documents, logs, configurations). This universal approach increases productivity by eliminating the need for separate evaluation processes for each control type while managing complexity through standardized interfaces and common reasoning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating structured representations and models that replicate real-world control relationships in a simplified digital format. The system generates copied versions of policies, controls, and evidence with standardized schemas that preserve essential relationships while removing extraneous complexity. These copied representations enable automated processing through graph models, knowledge graphs, and structured data formats, making control relationship analysis more detectable and measurable while maintaining fidelity to the original complex relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20260064855A1Efficient evaluation of controls for a simulated inspection
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 INTERSTICE LABS INC
  • US20260064855A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064855A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064855A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system performs efficient execution of control tests for an organization. The system receives description of a set of controls. The system identifies a set of control tests associated with the controls. For each control, the system collects supporting information for the control. For each control test, the system performs the following steps. The system determines whether supporting information indicates that a condition required by the control failed to occur. The system determines whether the supporting information is applicable to the control test. The system determines whether the supporting information passes the control test. The system builds an output data structure representing a result of the control test. The system determines a final result by summarizing a set of results obtained from the set of control tests and performing a target action based on the final result.