AI Crop Attribute Prediction via Intelligent Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Crop attributes vary significantly due to site-specific conditions and cropping systems, making it challenging to predict and achieve specific attributes in plant growth, such as improved taste, nutrition, and sustainability, across different farming operations.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent sampling technique is used to identify optimal genetics, environment, and management practices, combined with AI/ML models to predict the probability of growing crops with desired attributes, score performance, and identify limiting factors, thereby optimizing cropping systems and reducing variability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional farming methods are used without AI/ML modeling, then operational simplicity is maintained, but crop attribute prediction accuracy and consistency deteriorate due to site-specific variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop attribute prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and model training during the planning phase, building predictive models before actual crop growth. This allows the system to pre-identify optimal genetics, environment, and management practices, so that when planting occurs, predictions are already available without requiring complex real-time analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an AI/ML model as an intermediary between raw farming data and decision-making. This model acts as a mediator that processes complex site-specific conditions (soil, weather, topography) and translates them into actionable predictions about crop attributes, simplifying the overall system while improving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection from all fields is performed, then prediction accuracy improves, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribute measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by collecting and processing data specific to each field's unique characteristics (soil type, topography, microclimate) rather than treating all fields uniformly. This allows the AI/ML model to make accurate predictions using only the relevant local data needed for each specific location, avoiding unnecessary processing of unrelated data from other fields

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the farming operation into discrete field-level units, each with its own data collection and prediction process. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple fields independently, reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive coverage across all operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If site-specific conditions are not considered, then farming operations become standardized and simpler, but crop attribute variability increases and desired attributes cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop attribute consistencyVSAvoidadaptability to site-specific conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by using AI/ML models to identify and adjust multiple cropping system parameters (genetics, plant population, fertility management, weed control) based on site-specific conditions. This allows the system to adapt to local variations while maintaining consistent desired attributes through coordinated parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the farming system adaptive rather than static. The AI/ML model continuously learns from data and adjusts recommendations based on changing site-specific conditions, allowing the system to maintain crop attribute consistency despite environmental variations across different fields and seasons

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250021906A1Automated process to identify optimal conditions and practices to grow plants with specific attributes
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 JOHNSON JEROME D
  • US20250021906A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021906A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021906A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention identifies the optimal genetics, environment, and management practices and predicts the probability of growing a crop with the desired attributes, quantifies the attribute, scores relative performance, and identifies actions management can take to increase probability of growing plants with specific attributes. The present invention uses an improved technique of data acquisition known as intelligent sampling. Intelligent sampling functions by identifying a minimal dataset that is used to train the model disclosed herein while still achieving acceptable accuracy.