AI Cyber Threat Detection via Self-Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cyber threat detection systems rely heavily on rule or signature-based analysis, leading to a high number of false positives and inefficiencies in identifying unknown threats.

Innovation Solution

The development of an artificial intelligence advanced cyber detection platform, CALI, which utilizes self-training and self-learning capabilities, combined with unsupervised machine learning, to autonomously and actively learn like a human, thereby detecting threats in a more anticipatory and natural manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rule or signature-based analysis is used for cyber threat detection, then detection coverage for known threats is improved, but false positives increase and unknown threats cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidability to detect unknown threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-training by automatically learning from network traffic data and threat intelligence feeds without requiring manual reconfiguration. The machine learning models continuously adapt to new threat patterns by processing incoming data and updating their detection parameters, enabling the system to detect unknown threats while maintaining accuracy through automated self-improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes detection parameters by adjusting machine learning model thresholds and weights based on evolving threat landscapes. The unsupervised learning algorithms modify their internal parameters in real-time based on network traffic patterns, allowing the system to adapt to new threat types while reducing false positives through data-driven parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained manually with labeled data, then detection precision is improved, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection precisionVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates manual training by implementing self-training mechanisms where the machine learning models automatically learn from network traffic data. The unsupervised learning algorithms cluster and analyze traffic patterns autonomously, eliminating the time-consuming process of manual data labeling while achieving high detection precision through automated pattern recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary unsupervised learning to establish baseline traffic patterns and anomaly thresholds before actual threat detection occurs. By pre-processing network data to learn normal behavior patterns, the system prepares detection models in advance, reducing real-time training requirements and enabling faster response to unknown threats

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If unsupervised learning algorithms are used to detect unknown threats, then adaptability to new threats is improved, but false positives may increase without human feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of unknown threatsVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where detected anomalies and confirmed threats are fed back into the machine learning models for retraining. This feedback mechanism allows the unsupervised learning algorithms to continuously refine their detection accuracy, reducing false positives while maintaining high adaptability to new threat patterns through iterative model improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a multi-functional approach where the same unsupervised learning infrastructure serves both anomaly detection and threat confirmation functions. The machine learning models perform multiple tasks including traffic classification, anomaly detection, and threat intelligence correlation, reducing the need for separate specialized systems and improving overall reliability through consolidated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250119448A1Methods and Systems for Analyzing Cybersecurity Threats
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 CYBRAICS INC
  • US20250119448A1 patent drawing
  • US20250119448A1 patent drawing
  • US20250119448A1 patent drawing

AI summary

To analyze cybersecurity threats, an analysis module of a processor may receive log data from at least one network node. The analysis module may identify at least one statistical outlier within the log data. The analysis module may determine that the at least one statistical outlier represents a cybersecurity threat by applying at least one machine learning algorithm to the at least one statistical outlier.